Heya Dan,
Dont worry, no offence taken at all

. Fred's Roller was an Aveling and Porter R10, same as ours, it got to 40mph, as it quite simply got out of control! Not a common occurance I can assure you.
Direct drive on a traction engine... That would involve two rather large cylinders mounted on the boiler sides, with a con rod down to a cam on the rear wheels... One turn of the wheel per cylinder stroke! So with a 5ft dia wheel...
Circumference = PI * dia
Circumference = 3.141 * 5
Cicumference = 15.7ft per stroke = traction engine can do up to say 300rpm so per min thats:
15ft * 300 strokes = 4500 ft a min = 0.8522727272727273 mps
or
51 mph approximatley
Thats using a conservative figure for the strokes per min of the traction engine, in practice I could invisage it being a lot more.. maybe nearer 600 rpm which gives
102mph.
You then consider the issue of steering. Some form of power assist steering would be required at that speed, thus a simple system using bevel gears could be implemented. Engaging a clutch one way or another to have a shaft driven steering system... The faster the engine goes and the shaft goes up and down, the faster the steering works!
Hey presto a traction engine which can be steered and does 100mph.
On the downside, the boiler would have to be increased in size to account for the bigger cylinders required to move such a large wheel directly, hence gearing on a normal traction engine.... Thinking about it, a 5ft dia wheel would make it somwhat similar to say a large 1870's single wheeler, similar to Sterlings maybe.
But, with the increased speed, and the steeper hills which are encountered on the roads (up to say a 1:6) the whole lot would be rather lightfooted.... maybe some sort of sanding device to aid adhesion should be fitted, or simply channels coming out from the ashpan, dropping cinders and ash in front of the wheels for grip.
Hmmm.. personally I think ill stick with what we've got...
Chris