New boilers.

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
User avatar
trainmad
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2936
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Derby

New boilers.

Post by trainmad »

Do you think it's right giving an engine a new boiler? I think if you change the loco's boiler, you change the loco. A bit like Edward Thomas
Paul Bardill
Volunteer Guard, Fireman and general tea boy at the Midland Railway Butterley
User avatar
baldwin
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 787
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Chippenham, Wiltshire

Post by baldwin »

With a lick of paint, what difference does it make, except give an engine a new lease of life. Wheels get retyred, cylinders get rebored.

Mervyn
User avatar
richsoft
Established Forum Member
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 12:16 am
Location: Warwick, UK
Contact:

Post by richsoft »

If you didn't change the boiler of locos, they would not be able to operate.

You are not allowed to just 'patch up' a boiler if it is too old, you have to build a new one.

This I think would be a great shame, and eventually there would be no steam locos left working as all there boilers would expire!

Cheers,

Richard
User avatar
trainmad
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2936
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Derby

Post by trainmad »

But surly with todays techniques you would be able to patch up a boiler
Paul Bardill
Volunteer Guard, Fireman and general tea boy at the Midland Railway Butterley
User avatar
wookey
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3158
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 4:09 pm
Location: devon

Post by wookey »

well, i suppose you have to remember what a boiler has to stand, i mean in most cases repairs are prob immpossible and even if they wern't, given the nature of the ways in which a boiler could fail you cant really chance any botched repairs,

when you think about it, if there's a large area of severe wastage inside the boiler barrel, with a kinda overall reduction in thickness of the boiler plates what can you really do anyway? lol, well short of patching the entire thing :wink:
User avatar
BruceB
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1178
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 8:22 pm
Location: Bangor, N. Wales
Contact:

Post by BruceB »

Bolier never last for ever, all most locos won't have there original bolier anyway. I know the ET can't be the one it had when it arrived.

This brings us to the NRM's great question:
What the hell should we be presevering?
The psyical material (in which they can't run) or the memeory of Steam trains at work.

Bruce
Spooners TS Founder/Project Co-Ordinator.
http://www.spoonersts.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------
Image
User avatar
jdtech
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 988
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 9:44 pm
Location: England, Hampshire, Ashurst

Post by jdtech »

I agree Wookey.
The Talyllyn Railway - The World's First Preserved Railway

Image
User avatar
pitleyfalley
Builder of the Southwold Railway Route
Posts: 2366
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 11:56 pm
Location: Tinkering with a new project

Post by pitleyfalley »

Bruce, ET has a 1964 hunslet boiler I believe, well it did have anyway!! It doesnt have a boiler at the moment.

I believe that we should be preserving the memory of the engines. Although i disgaree with some of the rebuilds where the engine is completley changed. All that is left of No.2 now for insatance, is one con rod, and a valve i think! In this respect, I am 110% behind the Maidny Hall/Lady of Legend project, & the Tornado A1 appeal which is preservation of the memory of steam

Chris
User avatar
ManxPeacock
Totally Narrow Minded
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Isle of Man UK
Contact:

Post by ManxPeacock »

Boilers don't last forever, nor does many of the other parts of a locomotive. Many of the older engines you see in service on the Talyllyn, Ffestiniog and the IoM Railway will not have many of the original components on them. They say that some of the older Manx locos from 1870s have had their boiler, sidetanks, cabs, bunkers, wheels, cylinders and even chassis replaced, and that all that remains of the original locomotive is the nameplates and these too could well be replicas.

Just because the boiler is condemned, doesn't mean the engine is. If this was the case we wouldn't be left with any great historic narrow gauge locomotives which make up a lot of the appeal of narrow gauge.

The boiler is heart of a locomotive and its normally covered with insulation and cosmetic covers and can't be seen.


David
Totally narrow minded and a Isle of Man Railway nutter....

railways@manx.net

Don't forget the Isle of Man has more narrow gauge than you can wave a stick at. Steam - Diesel - Electric and even Horse power - Visitors most welcome...........
dcduncan
Established Forum Member
Posts: 398
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 2:34 pm
Location: South Wales

Post by dcduncan »

I have had this knife 20 years, its had 4 new blades and 2 new handles, still the same knife though.

After all the engines in thier worling life often were rebuilt, eg Quarry Hunslets there is no such thing as an original one. They were reboilered with whatever boiler would fit and had been reconditioned. Nobody argues that they are different engines. And No1 was completely rebuilt in the late 50's or early 60's (I can't remember exactly when) by Hunslet and though the amount of work done was criticised at the time and after, the engine would have been a static museum exibit had this not been done. The original firebox was only thou's off disastrous failure when it was last used to rescue Dolgoch. Nobody now thinks it should not be done.
David
Locked

Return to “Narrow Gauge”