What do you think?

GlennMitchell · Post by **GlennMitchell** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:18 pm

Can anyone that has downloaded my "train failure" or "transpennine express via doncaster" activies (files below) tell me what they think of them. If it was good, if it was absolutely rubbish, that kind of thing. Also any way I can improve future activities.
Many thanks
GM

Train failure [178274 bytes] - Train failure.exe
File ID: 15139 Date: 27 Aug 2006 - 860 Downloads

Transpennine Express via Doncaster [17688 bytes] - Transpennine Express Activity.ZIP
File ID: 15042 Date: 14 Aug 2006 - 712 Downloads

Post by **king125** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:15 am

Hi Glen, had a problem with the activity Transpennine Express via Doncaster first time see this thread http://forums.uktrainsim.com/viewtopic. ... ht=#693618

But that was my fault for going to slow, but the second time of trying completed it with no problems and enjoyed it very much.

Still to run the Train Failure its on my list of activites to do, should run it later today, and will get back you to let you know what I thought of it.

Terry

GlennMitchell · Post by **GlennMitchell** » Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:17 pm

Terry,
Did the HST crash into you? I worked andd worked with that, I got it working eventually. I wondered what had happened the first time! I had to put the timing of that train back by about a minute, but it obviously didn't work.
Thanks for downlaoding!
Glenn

Damo · Post by **Damo** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:55 pm

I like your activities but the first one did take me a couple of goes before the HST stopped crashing into me. Perhaps in any future ones you could make them so the player train is not at such a risk?

Other than that I would be very happy if you made more activities.

GlennMitchell · Post by **GlennMitchell** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 6:00 pm

hmm..yes.. That might be good. Sorry about that guys! I'll have to come up with some more ideas

Post by **king125** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 9:41 am

Finaly got to run your train failure activty

it was very good but I arrived at York 14 mins late

I think one of the reasons why I was so late was because I kept within the max speed that the loco can do, but will give it another run when I can to see if I can arrive on time.

Your other act the Hst only collided with me on the 1st time I run the act, but I think that was my fault for going to slow.

Keep up the good work and look forward to any future activities from you.

Terry

GlennMitchell · Post by **GlennMitchell** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:50 pm

I'm currently working on an activity for Dorset Coast V3. It might be a while. The AE keeps stopping when calculating AI timetables!

Website · Post by **Easilyconfused** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:59 pm

GlennMitchell wrote:I'm currently working on an activity for Dorset Coast V3. It might be a while. The AE keeps stopping when calculating AI timetables!

I would not let the AE calculate the times. It is far better to run the activity and then manually enter the times. The instructions on how to do that are in a number of threads on these forums.

Kindest regards

John

GlennMitchell · Post by **GlennMitchell** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:45 am

My newest activity is now on the site.

Waterloo - Basingstoke via Richmond [264387 bytes] - Waterloo - Basingstoke Via Richmond.exe
File ID: 15342 Date: 03 Oct 2006 - 1016 Downloads

GM

justinford · Post by **justinford** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:28 pm

GlennMitchell wrote:My newest activity is now on the site.

Waterloo - Basingstoke via Richmond [264387 bytes] - Waterloo - Basingstoke Via Richmond.exe
File ID: 15342 Date: 03 Oct 2006 - 1016 Downloads

GM

Hi,

This act doesn't work with the CD version of the route, error messages came up with missing SWT 170.

But, i did change the consists to the one's that are on the CD and is a good activity.

Regards,
Justin.

GlennMitchell · Post by **GlennMitchell** » Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:17 am

justinford wrote:
GlennMitchell wrote:My newest activity is now on the site.

Waterloo - Basingstoke via Richmond [264387 bytes] - Waterloo - Basingstoke Via Richmond.exe
File ID: 15342 Date: 03 Oct 2006 - 1016 Downloads

GM
Hi,

This act doesn't work with the CD version of the route, error messages came up with missing SWT 170.

Justin.

Thanks for that. Ill have to edit the download info

carlwestwood · Post by **carlwestwood** » Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:36 am

why did you use that old turbostar model, when their is a far better newer model avaliable...

South West Trains Turbostar [2086153 bytes] - swt170.zip
File ID: 9128 Date: 21 May 2004 - 10139 Downloads

South West Trains '170392' [1506824 bytes] - SWT_170392.zip
File ID: 15294 Date: 21 Sep 2006 - 2070 Downloads

GlennMitchell · Post by **GlennMitchell** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:09 pm

I dont really know. I think I must have seen the models on UKTS, and thought that I already had them. Things like this always get past me! Sorry if it is an inconvenience!

GM

Atomic Systems

What do you think?

What do you think?

Waterloo to basingstoke

Re: Waterloo to basingstoke