Knight time
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Knight time
Thanks Mike - Happy New Year and I'll look forward to your e-mail.
-
michaelhendle
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 8189
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 4:15 pm
- Location: Peterborough originally Hounslow &Durban
Re: Knight time
Danny it doesn't matter if you don't make the name I suggested, I didn't realize you had so many names recomended,I will look forward to downloading any of the Arthurs you release.
I appreciate the time and effort you put into the loco's you make,just wish I had the nohow in making loco's
I appreciate the time and effort you put into the loco's you make,just wish I had the nohow in making loco's
-
cardean
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:23 pm
- Location: Aberdeen, The Granite City
Re: Knight time
Danny,
Excuse my ignorance,but what is a freight animation?
As you know I'm new to all this and I'm not up to speed with all of the more technical details of making things work properly in MSTS.
For instance, with some of the models I've made, my computer freezes or crashes when I'm close into the subject and I'm fairly sure it has to do with the poly count on the model.
Do you know of any tutorials that will help me clarify some of thr problems I'm having.
Cheers
John.
Looking forward to the Urie Arthur
Excuse my ignorance,but what is a freight animation?
As you know I'm new to all this and I'm not up to speed with all of the more technical details of making things work properly in MSTS.
For instance, with some of the models I've made, my computer freezes or crashes when I'm close into the subject and I'm fairly sure it has to do with the poly count on the model.
Do you know of any tutorials that will help me clarify some of thr problems I'm having.
Cheers
John.
Looking forward to the Urie Arthur
- jbilton
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 19267
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:08 pm
- Location: At home ..waiting to go to Work.
- Contact:
Re: Knight time
Hi Johncardean wrote:Danny,
Excuse my ignorance,but what is a freight animation?
As you know I'm new to all this and I'm not up to speed with all of the more technical details of making things work properly in MSTS.
Cheers
John.
Looking forward to the Urie Arthur
http://steam4me.railpage.org.au/trainsi ... _anim.html
By adding some of the detail as a seperate shape, it can get round the poly count problem.
Cheers
Jon
------------------------Supporting whats good in the British community------------------------


Re: Knight time
Jon's right, the steam4me site has some very good tutorials and tips.
To reduce the chances of the sim freezing when trying your models, and from my limited experience with TSM, always do the Geometry check which adjusts non-planar (?) polys - if any part is distorted afterwards then you might need to remake it. Also, as the poly count goes up on your model (around 10K or more), you should use Decapod's ShapeFix - this is absolutely essential - and you might need to feed the model through Shapefix 2 or 3 times to get things to run smoothly.
The King Arthur is over 16K polys. At one stage I just couldn't get it into the sim, so I started virtually from scratch adding a part at a time to find which part(s) were causing the problem. The chimney was one, and also copper pipes were troublesome too, so adding these as a separate shape file by FreightAnim solved it.
Incidentally, I managed to add a crew by using a FreightAnim on the tender. As Jon pointed out earlier in this thread, one FreightAnim can be used per component in a consist.
To reduce the chances of the sim freezing when trying your models, and from my limited experience with TSM, always do the Geometry check which adjusts non-planar (?) polys - if any part is distorted afterwards then you might need to remake it. Also, as the poly count goes up on your model (around 10K or more), you should use Decapod's ShapeFix - this is absolutely essential - and you might need to feed the model through Shapefix 2 or 3 times to get things to run smoothly.
The King Arthur is over 16K polys. At one stage I just couldn't get it into the sim, so I started virtually from scratch adding a part at a time to find which part(s) were causing the problem. The chimney was one, and also copper pipes were troublesome too, so adding these as a separate shape file by FreightAnim solved it.
Incidentally, I managed to add a crew by using a FreightAnim on the tender. As Jon pointed out earlier in this thread, one FreightAnim can be used per component in a consist.
Re: Knight time
Urie Arthur "Maid of Astolat"........








-
cardean
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:23 pm
- Location: Aberdeen, The Granite City
Re: Knight time
Jon and Danny, Thanks for the advice
I'm sorry it's taken so long to get back to you, but I've had a bout of flu' and I've been feeling pretty grim
Danny, I've had a look at some references,( Peter Swift's book on the King Arthur's_ Locomotives in Detail No4) and from what I can see The lining on the Urie and Eastleigh Arthurs' cabs was carried to the top and not as you've depicted. Also I can't see any rivet heads either
Great looking model though
Hope you don't mind me saying.
Cheers
John.
I'm sorry it's taken so long to get back to you, but I've had a bout of flu' and I've been feeling pretty grim
Danny, I've had a look at some references,( Peter Swift's book on the King Arthur's_ Locomotives in Detail No4) and from what I can see The lining on the Urie and Eastleigh Arthurs' cabs was carried to the top and not as you've depicted. Also I can't see any rivet heads either
Great looking model though
Hope you don't mind me saying.
Cheers
John.
Re: Knight time
That's come from modelling the Scotch Arthur first and then using more or less the same textures.............it can be changed though.The lining on the Urie and Eastleigh Arthurs' cabs was carried to the top and not as you've depicted. Also I can't see any rivet heads either
Incidentally I have the same reference.
-
slipperman12
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 6067
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:50 am
- Location: North Nottinghamshire, UK
Re: Knight time
Hi Danny,
I know I'm a little late, but I've just downloaded Sir Aglovale. What a fine looking loco it is! I have one observation, and sorry to be nit-picking, but shouldn't the lion on the tender be facing to the left on both sides? I apologise if this has been raised before.
Keep up the marvellous work.
Regards,
Ged
I know I'm a little late, but I've just downloaded Sir Aglovale. What a fine looking loco it is! I have one observation, and sorry to be nit-picking, but shouldn't the lion on the tender be facing to the left on both sides? I apologise if this has been raised before.
Keep up the marvellous work.
Regards,
Ged
Intel i5-4690K (3.5Ghz), Gigabyte GA-Z97P-D3 m/b, 12GB DDR3 RAM, NVIDIA GTX 750ti (2GB) graphics card, Asus Xonar DS sound card. Win 10 Pro 64-bit.
Re: Knight time
I admit to being confused with this - and I think that BR were too! I've seen it argued that both lions should face to the front, and so this is what I did with the N15X. I then read in the Locomotives in Detail book for King Arthurs that "the heraldically correct backwards facing lion is painted on the right side of the tender" - so for Sir Aglovale both lions are facing backwards. I see there is another extract that says " from March 1957 the second BR totem was applied with the heraldically incorrect right-facing lion on the right hand side until mid 1958 - left facing lions were subsequently painted on both sides".shouldn't the lion on the tender be facing to the left on both sides?
So there is a good chance that I have this wrong - but in several areas of this model I have had to compromise, and I personally don't feel this is a serious enough issue to justify withdrawing the model to change it. However I do have another King Arthur almost ready to upload - Maid of Astolat is a Urie Arthur that has the same tender as Sir Aglovale, and it's tender currently carries the earlier totem. I will change the direction of the lion on this one to face left on both sides - then community downloaders can swop and choose whichever tender they prefer.
- ianmacmillan
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 9588
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:39 pm
- Location: N. Lanarkshire Scotland
Re: Knight time
ianmacmillan wrote: The early feret on a mono cycle was produced facing forward on both sides.
The later ferret with dartboard that was registered with the Royal Collage of flunkies.
When they discovered that BR had produced two versions a decree was issued telling them to remove it.
Since this was a royal proclamation, refusal to comply was punishable by hanging.
Naturaly the GW complied immediately while the more militant LMS men delayed as long as possible.
No one was hanged.
So it depends on how many locos got the forward facing second version before it was stopped and how bolshie the shed foreman was in changing it.
[album 80489 WWCo.jpg]
If it's got buffers it's Chain.
If it's got buffers it's Chain.
Re: Knight time
Nice one, Ian.

-
slipperman12
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 6067
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:50 am
- Location: North Nottinghamshire, UK
Re: Knight time
Hi Danny,
Thanks for the reply. I really do appreciate the amount of effort involved to producing one of your models. From what Ian has said (I knew I'd seen it somewhere before!), if your new model has the earlier totem, like the N15X, it won't need changing from facing forward on each side.
Cheers,
Ged
Thanks for the reply. I really do appreciate the amount of effort involved to producing one of your models. From what Ian has said (I knew I'd seen it somewhere before!), if your new model has the earlier totem, like the N15X, it won't need changing from facing forward on each side.
Cheers,
Ged
Intel i5-4690K (3.5Ghz), Gigabyte GA-Z97P-D3 m/b, 12GB DDR3 RAM, NVIDIA GTX 750ti (2GB) graphics card, Asus Xonar DS sound card. Win 10 Pro 64-bit.
- jbilton
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 19267
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:08 pm
- Location: At home ..waiting to go to Work.
- Contact:
Re: Knight time
Me tooslipperman12 wrote:Hi Danny,
Thanks for the reply. I really do appreciate the amount of effort involved to producing one of your models.
Cheers,
Ged
Cheers
Jon
------------------------Supporting whats good in the British community------------------------


Re: Knight time
Thanks Ged and Jon.
I've just uploaded a model of "Sir Lavaine". I hadn't intended to do another Scotch Arthur, but I noticed a slight kick in the animation of one of the rods - so I've fixed this and also changed the direction of the totem on the tender. I've included files to update 30781 and 30777 too. This seemed a better way to change things rather than issuing just a patch.
I've just uploaded a model of "Sir Lavaine". I hadn't intended to do another Scotch Arthur, but I noticed a slight kick in the animation of one of the rods - so I've fixed this and also changed the direction of the totem on the tender. I've included files to update 30781 and 30777 too. This seemed a better way to change things rather than issuing just a patch.