Page 1 of 2
keep guessing what it is (update!), and something else
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2002 9:48 pm
by RussellBurgess
Ok, so you still don't know what it is? well, the next clue is 47x, guess the last digit!
The next clue is to go with the prievous (I have to give to much away!),
"The MLV and GLV's TOPS have a 2 digits in common, and so does this Railcar"
Anyway, to the shots,

And a close up of the bogie;

Yes, I can see everyone is hating it already!
Anyway, I thought I'll attach David Babb's unit (aka Buffy), and I created this monster! After spending hours to get the unit to work!

Sussex Rail's offical livery!
I'd like to ask David, may I upload it?
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2002 10:40 pm
by buffy500
Images don't work
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2002 11:42 am
by johndibben
That's to make it that bit more of a challenge .... no doubt.
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2002 6:00 pm
by RussellBurgess
johndibben wrote:That's to make it that bit more of a challenge .... no doubt.
Ok, to spoil it all, I'll give it away!
It's known as a Class 479 Railcar, which can be used for AC or DC operaion. Designed to have 400hp per an axle, with frame-hung traction motors, going through a series of reduction gearing, and springs. And top Speed is designed to be 120-125mph maximun.
And design to also pull articulated or non-articulated 3 car trailler stock with a DTSL
RWSB
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2002 8:54 pm
by RussellBurgess
ok, time for an update!

Need more to say?
Anyway, I tried to export it, and all I got is "Make sure each name is unique", when they are!
Why does it happen to me?
Anyone like to try exporting it on my behalf?
RWSB
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2002 9:28 pm
by basildd
Two red x's - is it double headed???

Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2002 9:34 pm
by RussellBurgess
basildd wrote:Two red x's - is it double headed???

Yes, it's double cabbed, and named City Of Chichester"! The number of it is 479101, for the record!
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2002 9:28 am
by NeutronIC
Russell, in case it isn't clear - nobody else can see the images you're posting, all we get are broken image markers as presumably whomever hosts your images doesn't permit remote linking.
Matt.
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2002 11:53 am
by danielwilkieuk
Strange, I can see the images fine and always have seen them since the start of this topic
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2002 12:25 pm
by NeutronIC
That's bizarre, I've never been able to see any of Russell's images and got the impression nobody else could either, - never mind then, ignore me
Matt.
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2002 1:20 pm
by buffy500
I don't see them, but if I copy the url from the image properties then it works...
Very strange..
As for Rusells request on the 375....as that model was only a quick hack, the current version should be considered as a 'community' version, and as the readme said, repaints are allowed.
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2002 2:00 pm
by basildd
Same here - thats why I commented on the red X's....
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2002 4:02 pm
by isambardkingdombrunel
Piccies are loud and clear ,here.
IKB.
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2002 4:05 pm
by danielwilkieuk
Very wierd...
P.S Welcome back IkB

any new screenshots for us

?
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2002 6:23 pm
by buffy500
Once I'd copied and pasted the urls into another browser and got them loaded, they then appeared in the thread...