Class 465's & 466's....

Learn the finer points of making your own engines and wagons!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Stooopidperson
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6947
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2002 2:51 pm
Location: Planet Stooopid (5 Earth seconds=1 Stooopid day)

Post by Stooopidperson »

buffy500 wrote:Just like the exposed versions on the Desiros.
Do the positions of those of Desiros match the Networkers?
If you were wondering, the avatar is me on Planet Stooopid...
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

No.

Ones on the SW lines and the other is on the SC/SE lines.
Image
User avatar
BR7MT
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3226
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Kent

Post by BR7MT »

Currently the Networkers are receiving anti-surfing modifications. These involve fitted new covers above the 'buffers' so that the step cannot be used for surfing, the handrails on the window are going as well.

On closer inspection the Angel-owned units (built by GEC-Alsthom) have been fitted with a new cab air-conditioning unit. This has entailed bolting a cover with a grill on it above the cab.

The couplers now also sport a green plastic cover to prevent dirt ingress into the internal parts.

regards

Dan
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried :)

My uploads
User avatar
Stooopidperson
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6947
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2002 2:51 pm
Location: Planet Stooopid (5 Earth seconds=1 Stooopid day)

Post by Stooopidperson »

BR7MT wrote:Currently the Networkers are receiving anti-surfing modifications. These involve fitted new covers above the 'buffers' so that the step cannot be used for surfing, the handrails on the window are going as well.
Hmmm... :-? Talking about buffers, what is the purpose of buffers anyway? Most new trains don't have them... :-?
If you were wondering, the avatar is me on Planet Stooopid...
User avatar
47522
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1457
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:43 pm
Contact:

Post by 47522 »

I think they where steps so that the diver could clean his windscreen.
and would make it easy for the depot staff to reach other things like the lights and windscreen wipers.

Perhaps thats where the train surfers relized that they could hang on the front, when they saw a driver cleaning his windscreen :roll:


The 165/6's have small steps.

Regards
Matt
User avatar
thestoat
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 12:00 am

Post by thestoat »

Buffers go back to the beginning of time with trains. They kept the rolling stock apart to prevent them damaging each other while at the same time absorbing any compression forces between them. A loose coupling (chain or screw) would keep the rolling stock coupled together.

When 'buckeye' couplings first came about, this was the first step to do away with buffers. The buckeye would keep the rolling stock coupled together while at the same time keep it a fixed distance apart. Buffers were then not required. On coaching stock, there was a 'rubbing plate' above the buckeye which took the place of buffers. Take a look at the front of non-corridor SR units (EPB or MLV), you'll see the buckeye and rubbing plate. On corridor units (CEPs VEPs etc), the rubbing plate formed part of the corridor. The units also had buffers but these were retractable (normally positioned behind the rubbing plate) (there were no buffers on intermediate coaches). They could be moved forward and the buckeye dropped to allow them to be pulled by conventional couplinged locos. Class 33/1s and Class 73s also had 'drophead' buckeyes for this purpose.

Modern trains feature the 'tightlock' coupling (and others I can't think of) which have done away with buffers all together.
User avatar
BR7MT
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3226
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Kent

Post by BR7MT »

Dellner 12's and all sorts of couplers. Most modern couplers actually have electrical contacts so that you can get inter unit electronic communication without having to get out of your cab and connect up lots of separate jumper leads.

regards

Dan
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried :)

My uploads
User avatar
Stooopidperson
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6947
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2002 2:51 pm
Location: Planet Stooopid (5 Earth seconds=1 Stooopid day)

Post by Stooopidperson »

thestoat wrote:Buffers go back to the beginning of time with trains. They kept the rolling stock apart to prevent them damaging each other while at the same time absorbing any compression forces between them. A loose coupling (chain or screw) would keep the rolling stock coupled together.
So does that mean the buffers are pushing the wagons apart while the coupler pulled them together? :lol: :lol:
If you were wondering, the avatar is me on Planet Stooopid...
User avatar
thenudehamster
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5029
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Somewhere in cyberspace
Contact:

Post by thenudehamster »

In the case of a screw coupling, yes.
Loose couplings (3-link chains) are not in any kind of static tension or compression.
Chains, of any kind, cannot transmit compressive forces; buffers, active or passive, can't transmit tensile forces. Therefore the coupler provides the tension in the relationship, the buffers provide the compression.

A buckeye does both.
BarryH - thenudehamster
(nothing to do with unclothed pet rodents -- it's just where I used to live)
-----------------
Any opinion expressed above is herein warranted to be worth exactly what you paid for it.
Locked

Return to “[MSTS1] Building Rolling Stock”