Class 458

Learn the finer points of making your own engines and wagons!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
JCogman
Established Forum Member
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:30 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Class 458

Post by JCogman »

will anyone be creating the class 458 in south west trains livery?. :D
User avatar
47522
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1457
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:43 pm
Contact:

Post by 47522 »

** points in Buffy's direction** :D
Regards
Matt
User avatar
pepsipowell
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 896
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2003 8:07 am
Location: skiing! (probably)

Post by pepsipowell »

Unfortunately Buffy's Juniper TSM model is corrupt, so this is not possible (otherwise I would have finished it months ago), unless an entirely new model is built...

Jonathan 8)
Last edited by the ghost of Christmas future on 25 Dec 2054 22:06; edited 13 times in total
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

I imagine that if I looked hard enough at it, I might find a part finished version which was usable.
I will look into it.
Image
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

can you give it an eng file that makes it fail after 5 minutes? or you get to the first stop and the the doors don't work? The quest for ultimate realism :wink:
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

No.
Image
User avatar
richardpratt
Established Forum Member
Posts: 411
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 12:16 pm

Post by richardpratt »

To be honest, unless you want it as an historic train there is no point creating a Class 458, because South West Trains are withdrawing them at the end of the year.
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

I doubt very much they are headed for the scrap yard though are they ?
Image
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

I would doubt that they'll just bin some new, safety compliant trains. But SWT has had such a hard time making them go properly, that I don't know who else would take them on. I've heard rumours about GatEx, or even converting them to AC and sending them to scotland where they seem to be able to make junipers work better. But they're only rumours. Perhaps they'll be adapted for the East London Line extension or something...
User avatar
JCogman
Established Forum Member
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:30 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by JCogman »

i've been on a 458 from richmond-waterloo, a couple of times, and the trains seem fine. it always got to waterloo without failing and the doors worked fine.
User avatar
richardpratt
Established Forum Member
Posts: 411
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 12:16 pm

Post by richardpratt »

Yeah, they are good trains, seems weird they are removing them
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

I was being facetious. Though a guy in my office told me of one time when they were doing Aldershot - Guildford (Ascot - Guildford is a popular haunt for a 458) where they had such trouble with the doors at Ash that they abandoned the stop at Wanborough alltogether! I've had a fair number of rides on them, and they've never failed on me either, but they must have got the reputation from somewhere!
User avatar
petermakosch
The Midland Mainline Man
Posts: 3852
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:37 pm
Location: Pleasantville, UK
Contact:

Post by petermakosch »

I just think they look strange. Not like any other train really.
i want to be uploaded
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

arabiandisco wrote:I would doubt that they'll just bin some new, safety compliant trains. But SWT has had such a hard time making them go properly, that I don't know who else would take them on. I've heard rumours about GatEx, or even converting them to AC and sending them to scotland where they seem to be able to make junipers work better. But they're only rumours. Perhaps they'll be adapted for the East London Line extension or something...
I *think* that GeX and SPT have been ruled out, but who knows what the SRA will decide.
I know that since the announcement of them being returned the reliability has increased a lot. I think its not too unfair to say that there is a certain amount SWT "wanting" then to fail.
I imagine that a few other TOCs could make them work ok.
Image
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

maybe a bit of that, they have gone and bought desiros now, so they don't want to be embarrassed by 458s actually turning out better than what siemens can manage. Though I think they're getting about 20000mpc from a 450, and more like 3000mpc from a juniper. Though if they're improving that's probably out of date...

I daresay that since they have Northam to look after desiros, complete with siemens staff and so on, they're getting better care than they could do at Wimbledon with the guys who are used to the somewhat simpler mk1 and 455 stock!

I'm sure that if SET or SCT (or even silverlink or merseyrail) wanted to they could make 458s go a lot better than SWT have. GatEx have proved that junipers can do a bit better than the 458s have, as have SPT. Though GatEx still keep some 73s cos the 460s aren't quite onto the flat bit of the bathtub curve...
Locked

Return to “[MSTS1] Building Rolling Stock”