Given that a) The LBE version IS my model, b) You don't actually know what I have *tried* to release and c)Regardless of (b)I have released 317's which are 90% basically the same shape as both 455's I think I actually can fairly comment..wertyuv wrote:I suppose that LBE was realeased quite some time ago so obviously the model isnt going to be as good. However is it really fair to make comments about a model that
A you havent attemped to release a simuler model yet![]()
and B was only supposed to be used a scenary?
South East England by Train
Moderator: Moderators
- buffy500
- Mr DMU
- Posts: 6794
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
- Contact:
Re: South East England by Train
- wertyuv
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Aberdeen
Re: South East England by Train
My applogies Dave
However i do feel that it was a tiny bit harsh what you said.
I do understand your point now
However i do feel that it was a tiny bit harsh what you said.
I do understand your point now
I like trains.
- buffy500
- Mr DMU
- Posts: 6794
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
- Contact:
Re: South East England by Train
I'm not sure I understand why its harsh, it is a fairly simple model, and am I not allowed to be 100% honest about previous work.wertyuv wrote:However i do feel that it was a tiny bit harsh what you said.
If you look at the model close up it is not really a suitable model for player rolling stock. Granted that not what it was intended for, but that just makes it passable for what it was intended for.
It was able to get away with something that poor because you would basically only catch a glimpse of it in passing.
- wertyuv
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Aberdeen
Re: South East England by Train
I just felt how you said it was quite vicious
{edit, wow i really cant spell}
Thats all
Thats all
I like trains.