ECML
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 4:19 pm
Page 1 of 3
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 4:28 pm
Looks good, why a Pacer to Portsmouth Harbour?
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 4:49 pm
Would be better if you scaled the images down to 800x600 so many do not have to scroll.
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 5:08 pm
You alway get one bloody whinger.
Would be better if you scaled the images down to 800x600 so many do not have to scroll
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 6:59 pm
Nowhere near as good as Mideast 
David
David
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 9:59 pm
No no, its just that look at it. I am into User Friendliness, quite a lot (See my Transpennine 158 and Class 67 Installaion's), and i just think that it would be nicer to the 56K users if the images were a bit smaller.
I do that with my Info Screens, make 'em all 640x480 for the people stil on 800x600
I do that with my Info Screens, make 'em all 640x480 for the people stil on 800x600
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:29 pm
Looks good, when you releasing it??
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:51 pm
Is that done in MSTS?
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:24 am
Here is My "Toy" been doing this for a bit - Just a bit of fun when not doing MSTS stuff!
Click the image to zoom in
Click the image to zoom in
Click the image to zoom in
Click the image to zoom in
Click the image to zoom in
Click the image to zoom in
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 10:31 am
Save ur breath. IKB doesnt know politeness or respect for others. He isnt interested about problems others have, even if he causes them.
Looks like ECML for Trainz, SP1 or is that ment to be TSR2004? i can never tell, they're all contain the same files and bugs.
Tim, are you going for the MidEast success again? in a new game. Good luck, things are looking very well formed sofar
Looks like ECML for Trainz, SP1 or is that ment to be TSR2004? i can never tell, they're all contain the same files and bugs.
Tim, are you going for the MidEast success again? in a new game. Good luck, things are looking very well formed sofar
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:20 pm
Luca....
Not releasing this one - I use it for RailDriver work mainly, I also have a section of Galitzin tennels in the US which is better than this and complete.
The route pics are just a Fictional which I play trains on when I feel like it - Got about 60 miles on it so far although I doubt it will be getting any bigger - had it since UTC was made, ECML in trainz would be fun though.
Not releasing this one - I use it for RailDriver work mainly, I also have a section of Galitzin tennels in the US which is better than this and complete.
The route pics are just a Fictional which I play trains on when I feel like it - Got about 60 miles on it so far although I doubt it will be getting any bigger - had it since UTC was made, ECML in trainz would be fun though.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 1:14 pm
ah well, even just providing the screenshots is enough inspiration for encouragement of others to follow in ur steps.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 1:29 pm
Where do you want me to start?TRS2004 ,buggy don't make me laugh
David
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 1:32 pm
For . sake you two, GROW UP. Stop your freaking whindging, its boring, predictable and kills the thread. If you don't have anything nice to say...
DON'T SAY ANYTHING.
Clear?
DON'T SAY ANYTHING.
Clear?
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 1:40 pm
Well as i was on the beta test team,i must disagree with your glib remark.
All software has a certain amount of bugs,MSTS more than most.
I have used msts from before it was released in the UK. I have also been involved with Trainz from it`s inception and i know from experience which one crashes my pc the most and which one is the more versatile of the two.
I also know which of the two is properly supported,in fact only one is supported at all in an official capacity.
All software has a certain amount of bugs,MSTS more than most.
I have used msts from before it was released in the UK. I have also been involved with Trainz from it`s inception and i know from experience which one crashes my pc the most and which one is the more versatile of the two.
I also know which of the two is properly supported,in fact only one is supported at all in an official capacity.