Route Availabilty of Loco's (RA)
Moderator: Moderators
- megatron
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Cybertron, well Chorley Lancashire :)
Route Availabilty of Loco's (RA)
Just wondering if anyone could explain what this route availabilty value is?
In the last rail mag there's a comparison between thr 86 and 90 for anglia railways working.
The 86 is given a RA of 6 and 90 has one of 7.
But what do these figures actually mean and how are they worked out?
Also whats a round trackside sign with 2 numbers on it seperated by a horizontal line mean? Its like a speed limit but i dunno why its got 2 numbers on it!
Im just curious!
Thanks in advance!
Cheers
Guy
In the last rail mag there's a comparison between thr 86 and 90 for anglia railways working.
The 86 is given a RA of 6 and 90 has one of 7.
But what do these figures actually mean and how are they worked out?
Also whats a round trackside sign with 2 numbers on it seperated by a horizontal line mean? Its like a speed limit but i dunno why its got 2 numbers on it!
Im just curious!
Thanks in advance!
Cheers
Guy
-
Goingnorth
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:00 am
http://www.freightcommercial.co.uk/frei ... speeds.htm
Will explain everything
The sign sounds like a differential speed limit.
Will explain everything
The sign sounds like a differential speed limit.
Last edited by Goingnorth on Fri Aug 30, 2002 12:27 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
Goingnorth
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:00 am
Differential speed limits:
Bottom figure:
Passenger (loaded or empty) formed entirly of bogie vehicles. Parcels or Postal trains formed entirely of bogie vehicles, Light locos, Class 140 to 144 trains
Top figure:
Applies to ALL other trains
Someone as asking about Sandite markers too:
Yellow sign:
Three diagonal lines: Advance warning of application site
Two diagonal lines: Start applying sandite
One diagonal lines: Stop applying sandite
Here something else:
Maximum permitted speed of Locomotives running light and locomotive hauled trains (MPH)
Light locomotives: Line speed 90 or above, they can travel at 75mph. 85mph or less 60mph
One or two locomotives with one, two or three vehicles or Three or more locos and ANY number of vehicles. LS 90mph or more then 75mph. 85mph or less then 60mph.
Bottom figure:
Passenger (loaded or empty) formed entirly of bogie vehicles. Parcels or Postal trains formed entirely of bogie vehicles, Light locos, Class 140 to 144 trains
Top figure:
Applies to ALL other trains
Someone as asking about Sandite markers too:
Yellow sign:
Three diagonal lines: Advance warning of application site
Two diagonal lines: Start applying sandite
One diagonal lines: Stop applying sandite
Here something else:
Maximum permitted speed of Locomotives running light and locomotive hauled trains (MPH)
Light locomotives: Line speed 90 or above, they can travel at 75mph. 85mph or less 60mph
One or two locomotives with one, two or three vehicles or Three or more locos and ANY number of vehicles. LS 90mph or more then 75mph. 85mph or less then 60mph.
-
AlanP46
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Warwickshire
- Contact:
RA is simply a figure that represents the type of routes it can travel on:
1 - can go anywhere in the country (only 03s currently have this I think)
up to
RA8 - only top mainlines (67s are the only type restricted to this...)
Some kettles had higher! (Green Arrow, V2, is RA9).
It's worked out on weight ÷ no. of axles.
Alan
1 - can go anywhere in the country (only 03s currently have this I think)
up to
RA8 - only top mainlines (67s are the only type restricted to this...)
Some kettles had higher! (Green Arrow, V2, is RA9).
It's worked out on weight ÷ no. of axles.
Alan
On the other hand, I think Kestrel was RA9, so BR didn't even fancy running it on the ECML until Brush retro-fitted it with some class 47 bogies, to get it down to RA8 (I think).
Is it just based on axle weight or is it unsprung mass per axle (I think the latter as there seem to be loco's which had the same axle weight but different RAs).
By the way, that's the reason BR ran non-enthusiast excursions to Oban in 1981 with a Deltic: only thing at the time with both RA5 (47 is RA6) and e.t.h. (37/4s hadn't been invented).
Is it just based on axle weight or is it unsprung mass per axle (I think the latter as there seem to be loco's which had the same axle weight but different RAs).
By the way, that's the reason BR ran non-enthusiast excursions to Oban in 1981 with a Deltic: only thing at the time with both RA5 (47 is RA6) and e.t.h. (37/4s hadn't been invented).
Now that's interesting...
Just looked at the site goingnorth's kindly provided a link to... still not sure their definition of RA calculation is quite right (i.e. not just pure axle weight).
Another thing - is the Far North Line now really RA10? Was RA5 in my day - nice to see some things improve!
Another thing - is the Far North Line now really RA10? Was RA5 in my day - nice to see some things improve!
- chazcozens
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1183
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Essex, UK
RA9 actually meant that the vehicle (loco, wagon or whatever) required an exceptional loads form in order to run. This lays down a specific route which must not be deviated from.
All of the Foster Yeoman stuff (loco's and wagons) were RA9 when first introduced. Similarly preserved steam loco's were classed RA9 when I was at Stratford (1984-88). This was not necessarily a reflection of weight (I recall an ex-GWR pannier that was moved (not even under steam) with an RA9) but simply to ensure that they kept to a designated path.
All of the Foster Yeoman stuff (loco's and wagons) were RA9 when first introduced. Similarly preserved steam loco's were classed RA9 when I was at Stratford (1984-88). This was not necessarily a reflection of weight (I recall an ex-GWR pannier that was moved (not even under steam) with an RA9) but simply to ensure that they kept to a designated path.
Chaz.
Artificial Intelligence has no answer to real stupidity!
Artificial Intelligence has no answer to real stupidity!
-
Goingnorth
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:00 am