Liveries for ECE 3 are...

General MSTS related discussion that doesn't really fit into any of the other specific forums.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

Pompeyfan wrote:oh yea i forgot that you yourself make routes.

what do you mean by the above then?
Providing decent amounts of stock for a route is very time consuming, and generally expensive, life would be a lot simpler if a commercial route, was just that, "a route".
Image
User avatar
passedcleaner
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2083
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:06 pm
Location: Trowbridge

Post by passedcleaner »

It wouldn't sell very well though :lol:
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

passedcleaner wrote:It wouldn't sell very well though :lol:

That was not the question ! ;-)


It might be worth a seperate conversation on the subject.
It has some merit, how often do you hear people basically saying that they will use superior freeware stock ?
Image
User avatar
Pompeyfan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1356
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: pompey, hants

Post by Pompeyfan »

fair point. if you compare some stock to idental freeware stuff the Payware USUALLY wins. i must say how much i love the RR sprinter packs. can't remember the auther but was released in to packs. there was express alphaline regional railwas etc. hats off to him.
pompeyfan
User avatar
shaun123
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:24 pm

Post by shaun123 »

Do You think there will be passenger views for the 321 and 158. And how many activities do you think will utilise driving these units?
Backfoot2002
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2806
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 9:39 pm
Location: Sheffield

Post by Backfoot2002 »

Pompeyfan wrote:fair point. if you compare some stock to idental freeware stuff the Payware USUALLY wins. i must say how much i love the RR sprinter packs. can't remember the auther but was released in to packs. there was express alphaline regional railwas etc. hats off to him.
That was myself, and thank you, glad you like them. :)

With regards to the 158 sounds, I think they are ok at low speed, but at high speed, sounded like a high pitch whining was coming from somewhere that wasnt supposed to be there. The 321 sounds are very good though. Did notice though that the cabview was incorrect. The wipers were facing the wrong way. They were set to do east to west motion when they actualyl do south to east (or west) motion.
User avatar
NiallGray
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4282
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 1:55 am

Post by NiallGray »

Backfoot2002 wrote: The 321 sounds are very good though. Did notice though that the cabview was incorrect. The wipers were facing the wrong way. They were set to do east to west motion when they actualyl do south to east (or west) motion.
It appears to me the cabview is set up for a unit with 3 windows in the front of the cab, not two, like the 321. The shaping of the driver's window is wrong shape.
The Class 303/311 pack - 26 EMUs for MSTS/OR covering every era of these iconic Clyde-based units. From Caley Blue to Carmine and Cream!
Available now on UKTS - File 34622
User avatar
colinm74
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 115
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:37 am
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent

Post by colinm74 »

NiallGray wrote:
Backfoot2002 wrote: The 321 sounds are very good though. Did notice though that the cabview was incorrect. The wipers were facing the wrong way. They were set to do east to west motion when they actualyl do south to east (or west) motion.
It appears to me the cabview is set up for a unit with 3 windows in the front of the cab, not two, like the 321. The shaping of the driver's window is wrong shape.
It looks more than a bit like the 319 cab on LSC.
User avatar
Pompeyfan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1356
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: pompey, hants

Post by Pompeyfan »

colinm74 wrote:
NiallGray wrote:
Backfoot2002 wrote: The 321 sounds are very good though. Did notice though that the cabview was incorrect. The wipers were facing the wrong way. They were set to do east to west motion when they actualyl do south to east (or west) motion.
It appears to me the cabview is set up for a unit with 3 windows in the front of the cab, not two, like the 321. The shaping of the driver's window is wrong shape.
It looks more than a bit like the 319 cab on LSC.
compleatly agree with you. and once again, well done backfoot
pompeyfan
chester025
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1661
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:34 pm

Post by chester025 »

Hi,

Just recieved the Leeds Loop a couple of minutes ago! And its currently being installed!

Cheers,

Chester025
chester025
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1661
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:34 pm

Post by chester025 »

Hi,

It's just installed but I ordered from Europeanbahn which means I'm entitled to 6 extra activities which should boost me up to 18 acts but I can only find 12! In addition I sent off an E-mail about my 2 UKTS free premium months, and still (after 3 days!) no reply! Help me please!

Cheers,

Chester025
User avatar
6rdfar90
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:16 pm
Location: Leeds
Contact:

Post by 6rdfar90 »

I think the email also said to wait 14 days after release about both the activities and premium membership ~ ur lucky by the way. i got leeds loop next to me, but no pc to play it on!
Dan1983
Getting the hang of things now
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Essex

EB's 321

Post by Dan1983 »

We have 321s on Great Eastern, the wheelsets are slightly wrong, I agree with all.
User avatar
6rdfar90
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1445
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:16 pm
Location: Leeds
Contact:

Post by 6rdfar90 »

Well it seems quite a few people were wrong about the 158 included in Leeds Loop.
Another thing is that the 158's skirting doesn't go down low enough, giving the front the appearance of being too wide, a bit squashed.

According to my 1995 Platform 5 combined volume, 158743 was built for Scotland and allocated to Haymarket. So the First Class is actually correct for the unit number, but therefore that particular unit should have below-cab snowploughs. And of course never worked south of Edinburgh, and so shouldn't be on the addon.

Looks like EB scored an own-goal.

The other thing that makes the front look strange is the amount of yellow. Originally, the entire windscreen/destination blind/headlight cluster assembly of TPX units was completely black, with yellow around the edges, and looked a lot more sleek than the portrayed Scotrail-style version, which has yellow highlighting.

The Scotrail front end is shown here:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image ... stbury.JPG

The original colouring on the transpennine and WYPTE units' cabs is shown here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:1589 ... caster.JPG

Note that the English units had glass in the corridor connection door, whereas the Scotrail units did not.

So a correct transpennine-build two-car 158 should be numbered from 158760-779, or 781. A 3 car unit would be 158798-814. WYPTE are 158901-910. It should have the normal lower skirting at the front, and have no First Class. It should also say EXPRESS in the bodyside stripes, not Regional Railways (only the Canton and Crown Point units had that.)
The train included isnt even that running number. It was obviously just to show a few screenshots.
Backfoot2002
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2806
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 9:39 pm
Location: Sheffield

Post by Backfoot2002 »

6rdfar90 wrote:Well it seems quite a few people were wrong about the 158 included in Leeds Loop.
Another thing is that the 158's skirting doesn't go down low enough, giving the front the appearance of being too wide, a bit squashed.

According to my 1995 Platform 5 combined volume, 158743 was built for Scotland and allocated to Haymarket. So the First Class is actually correct for the unit number, but therefore that particular unit should have below-cab snowploughs. And of course never worked south of Edinburgh, and so shouldn't be on the addon.

Looks like EB scored an own-goal.

The other thing that makes the front look strange is the amount of yellow. Originally, the entire windscreen/destination blind/headlight cluster assembly of TPX units was completely black, with yellow around the edges, and looked a lot more sleek than the portrayed Scotrail-style version, which has yellow highlighting.

The Scotrail front end is shown here:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image ... stbury.JPG

The original colouring on the transpennine and WYPTE units' cabs is shown here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:1589 ... caster.JPG

Note that the English units had glass in the corridor connection door, whereas the Scotrail units did not.

So a correct transpennine-build two-car 158 should be numbered from 158760-779, or 781. A 3 car unit would be 158798-814. WYPTE are 158901-910. It should have the normal lower skirting at the front, and have no First Class. It should also say EXPRESS in the bodyside stripes, not Regional Railways (only the Canton and Crown Point units had that.)
The train included isnt even that running number. It was obviously just to show a few screenshots.
Or maybe they had the number wrong at first, read the thread about it and changed it?
Locked

Return to “[MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion”