Can anyone run Class 156 locos?

General MSTS related discussion that doesn't really fit into any of the other specific forums.

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
oldalistair
Getting the hang of things now
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 6:37 pm

Can anyone run Class 156 locos?

Post by oldalistair »

Sorry to return to an old thread of November of last year but I have just spent fruitless hours trying to get Cl156 locos to run without the dreaded 'Cannot create cabview' error. Of course I downloaded file ID 8859 from the library and placed it in the common.cab folder. All my downloaded 156 locos reference common.cab correctly in the .eng file, but MSTS refuses to play ball. I opened up the cl156.cvf file and noted references in it to some non-existent Dash9 files. I tried to fix this but without success. I can only assume that this .cvf file is corrupt, and since no other appears to exist I have had to admit defeat.
Has anyone out there managed to run these locos?
User avatar
vanstek
Established Forum Member
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: Best NL

Post by vanstek »

The file UKTS_6084_156420.zip, containing a 2 car DMU number 156420 which includes a 200.cvf cab does not give any problem. I dont know if the cab is correct (never having seen a real 156xxx) but for me it is good enough.
Wim
chrisiveson
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 8:15 am

Post by chrisiveson »

This is what you need:
 Click to view more informationClass 156 Cabview [2894041 bytes] - 156Cabview.exe
File ID: 8859 Date: 14 Apr 2004 - 9047 Downloads


And your .eng file should have the line:
CabView ( Cl156.cvf )
Chris.
User avatar
rtracey
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 4:56 pm
Location: Rotherham

Post by rtracey »

vanstek wrote:I dont know if the cab is correct (never having seen a real 156xxx) but for me it is good enough.
Have a look at this site.

http://members.madasafish.com/~dysgraph ... 56_cab.htm
oldalistair
Getting the hang of things now
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 6:37 pm

cl156.cvf

Post by oldalistair »

"This is what you need: "
File ID-8859

Sorry Chris. This is exactly the file that has caused me the headaches I describe. Have you run a loco with this?
Alistair
chrisiveson
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 8:15 am

Re: cl156.cvf

Post by chrisiveson »

oldalistair wrote:"This is what you need: "
File ID-8859

Sorry Chris. This is exactly the file that has caused me the headaches I describe. Have you run a loco with this?
Alistair
Well not a loco, it's a "Super Sprinter" DMU, I assume that's what you mean?





Chris.
User avatar
ashgray
Wafflus Maximus
Posts: 12235
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: GWR, Nailsea, Somerset

Post by ashgray »

I use this cab on all my installed 156 units without problems.

Cheers
Ashley
Ashley Gray

Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.2Ghz Quad Core, Gigabyte Gaming Motherboard, 2 x 512Gb SSDs + 1TB SATA drives,
16 Gb DDR-4 Corsair RAM, Nvidia GeForce GTX1060 6Gb RAM, ASUS Xonar D2X/XDT Soundcard, Windows 10 64 bit
User avatar
vanstek
Established Forum Member
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: Best NL

Post by vanstek »

My apologies for stating that the 2000 cab is usable for a 156.
In my trainset I have
UKTS_6048 is a 156420 with common 2000 cab
UKTS_6043 is a Central156 with common 2000 cab but also a possible use of an ArrivaCl156 cab using elements of the Dash9
UKTS_11392 is a Central-exRR156 with the ArrivaCl156 cab

After having seen not only the good set of pictures via the link provided by rtracey, and a look from camera 2 at the front of the models, I have to admit that the 2000 cab is completely wrong, it does not match the small driver cabin besides the inter-unit gangway. The ArrivaCl156 cab is better. The control panel and the small window matches the real thing, but for the left and right view ace files of the Dash9 are used.So I have downloaded the UKTS_8859 now. which is a common Cl156cab with all 156 specific ace files.
Sorry. no more time today, tomorrow is full, but after that will report the eventual problems with the installation.
Wim
chrisiveson
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 8:15 am

Post by chrisiveson »

ashgray wrote:I use this cab on all my installed 156 units without problems.

Cheers
Ashley
Yep, works with em all. :D
Invalid File ID [12292]




Chris.
User avatar
45002
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5801
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Hyperspace

Cab

Post by 45002 »

Hi

To use this cabview

 Click to view more informationClass 156 Cabview [2894041 bytes] - 156Cabview.exe
File ID: 8859 Date: 14 Apr 2004 - 9047 Downloads


you need to edit Eng file cab line to

"..\\..\\common.cab\\cl156\\cl156.cvf"

some of the class 156 you can download from this site are allready edited to use the above download

Lot of them are Not so you have to edit them as i shown you

hope you can understand me

MARTIN :D
User avatar
vanstek
Established Forum Member
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: Best NL

Post by vanstek »

Indeed oldalistair, I see your problem. The UKTS_8859 constructs a class 156 cab with an error. The file Cl156.cvf contains 8 CabViewControls. Number 9 should have been the TriState type direction control. Now that this is missing 1) the reverser level is not animated, and 2) mouse control of the reverser is not possible and 3) there is no small rectangle with the contents forward/neutral/reverse when using the W and S keys.

But now how to construct a cab in a class 156

Running UKTS_8859_156Cabview.exe creates the folder ...TRAINSET\common.cab\CL156 which contains the file Cl156.cvf plus 9 ace files.
One possibility to use this cab is to change the cabview line in every class 156 engine file to CabView ( ..\\..\\common.cab\\Cl156\\Cl156.cvf ) Note that only before and after a bracket is a single space. In this case the folder containing the class 156 does not need a subfolder with the name cabview.

Another possibility is to change the cabview line in every class 156 engine file to Cabview ( Cl156.cvf ) and put a copy of the file Cl156.cvf in every subfolder named CabView in every class 145 train

The 156 is a 2 car DMU, with the 3 different 156 versions which I have, the consists are
( central 156 central156DMSB ) and
( central 156 central156DMS ) both using UKTS_6043 and
( 156420 15642DMSB) using UKTS_6048 and
( Central-exRR156 Flip Central-exRR156DMS ) using UKTS_11392
After also inserting a cabview line in the Central-exRR156DMS at the location in the file corresponding the cabview line in the Central-exRR this DMU had a correct cab, and using the MSTS-bin update in my system, the reversed cab was correct. In all consists without the Flip ( ) command going to the cab in the rear unit show a cab looking the from the rear unit to the end of the front unit. So if a correct rear cab is to be made, each of the DMS and DMSB engine units also need the cabview line, but in the common folder a Cl156_rv.cvf has to be made. This however has the disadvantage that every unit now obtains a correct cab and an incorrect cab
User avatar
ianmacmillan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 9588
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:39 pm
Location: N. Lanarkshire Scotland

Post by ianmacmillan »

You can avoid having the view of the coach end by renaming the xxxx_rv.cvf to read....

xxxx_reversed.cvf.

Change the cabview line in the rear facing unit to xxxx_reversed.cvf.
You can then select the rear cab by selecting the rear unit in F9.

Use this method for all single cab EMUs and DMUs.
[album 80489 WWCo.jpg]
If it's got buffers it's Chain.
User avatar
vanstek
Established Forum Member
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: Best NL

Post by vanstek »

Thanks Ian,
my ( Central156 + Central156DMSB ) now have proper cabs at the ends. This did not influence the ( Central-exRR156 + flip + Central-exRR156DMS )
The Central156DMS I have removed and all consists changed accordingly, because it does not match the breaking system and the colour of either pair. Must be a part of another train.
Wim
Locked

Return to “[MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion”