A2 Sayajirao

eddief · Post by **eddief** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 3:36 pm

I think iy is aliased to the defaul Scotsman cab, those screenshots are a passenger view (key 5) added to the eng file

.

nelson · Post by **nelson** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 3:38 pm

yeah, I know, hence the referral to Jon Bilton's post on how to set up the passenger view

kevpotts · Post by **kevpotts** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 6:17 pm

That's what's confusing me. How do I alias to get those internal views? Perhaps Jbilton could help? (keeping it simple please!!)

dforrest · Post by **dforrest** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:17 pm

dforrest wrote:Should the water filling spout on the tender be untextured (white)? Mine is.

Does anyone else have this problem?

.

BobLatimer · Post by **BobLatimer** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:06 pm

I do. Mine is white too.

JonathonAG · Post by **JonathonAG** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:17 pm

same with mine

mickoo · Post by **mickoo** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:33 pm

Interesting choice of loco, 15 to choose from and picks the exact same Blue Arrow previewed a while back for commercial sale, interesting indeed.

Best regards

Michael

JonathonAG · Post by **JonathonAG** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:38 pm

mickoo wrote:Interesting choice of loco, 15 to choose from and picks the exact same Blue Arrow previewed a while back for commercial sale, interesting indeed.

Best regards

Michael

Yes, it is very supicious, and i do believe that the BATS A2 was shown to the public first ( completed aswell ), so is very supicious. But then again, you can't beat BATS standards

So who cares, let freeware be freeware, let payware be payware. I am sure it makes no difference

rwaceyw · Post by **rwaceyw** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:41 pm

Theres nothing suspicious about it, John. if he wants to model that A2 let the man model it!

David

Neptune50006 · Post by **Neptune50006** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:54 pm

For goodness sake! Stop stiring things up! Just get on and enjoy what other people have the generosity to provide us with.

nelson · Post by **nelson** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:56 pm

Neptune50006 wrote:For goodness sake! Stop stiring things up! Just get on and enjoy what other people have the generosity to provide us with.

Hear Hear!!!

nelson · Post by **nelson** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:57 pm

Done a bloomin' good job too!!!

JonathonAG · Post by **JonathonAG** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:59 pm

nelson wrote:Done a bloomin' good job too!!!

yip, you have to say it is one of his best models yet

mickoo · Post by **mickoo** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 9:41 pm

Not stirring, just voicing an observation, obviously something else that was thrown out whilst l was away.

As you say let it be.

>>Theres nothing suspicious about it, John. if he wants to model that A2 let the man model it! <<

Interesting comment, l remember well the arguing and back biting when two designers tired to repaint the same loco to the same subject, people were not so cordial then ! and that was a freeware loco for goodness sake !.

Best regards

Michael

rwaceyw · Post by **rwaceyw** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 9:45 pm

>>Theres nothing suspicious about it, John. if he wants to model that A2 let the man model it! <<

Interesting comment, l remember well the arguing and back biting when two designers tired to repaint the same loco to the same subject, people were not so cordial then ! and that was a freeware loco for goodness sake !.

Different circumstances

. I don't see many complaining over there being two or three D1013's for example...

Out of 15 A2's to choose from, does it matter 60530 was chosen? I'm sure there'll be reskins of both the UKTS and BATS versions that clash, so why are we meithered about this one?

David