Class Locos

buffy500 · Post by **buffy500** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:36 am

demonshadow wrote:same was for 91 only being 225 instead

There was never a 225.
That 'name' came from a top speed of 225 km per hour top speed.

so therefore by this can we safely agree the 220 series was electric?[/quote]

Diesels are 101 up.

Voyagers are 220 and 221, Meridians 222, all are Diesels.

*Edited to make Dale look silly!*

basildd · Post by **basildd** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:45 am

buffy500 wrote:
demonshadow wrote:same was for 91 only being 225 instead
There was never a 225.
That 'name' came from a top speed of 2225 km per hour top speed.

so therefore by this can we safely agree the 220 series was electric?

2225km per hour is definitely a 'top speed'

basildd · Post by **basildd** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:56 am

allypally wrote:http://www.railfaneurope.net/pix/gb/die ... R/pix.html
There are at least 3 pics of Class 43s on their lonesome.

[/quote]

Not quite the same as this though is it!

jbilton · Post by **jbilton** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 8:03 am

Now thats what I call a loco!!...

buffy500 · Post by **buffy500** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 8:15 am

jbilton wrote:Now thats what I call a loco!!...

Its also what TOPS calls a loco too !

Stooopidperson · Post by **Stooopidperson** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 10:34 am

buffy500 wrote:There was never a 225.
That 'name' came from a top speed of 225 km per hour top speed.

Otherwise, the HSTs would be Class 125s!

basildd · Post by **basildd** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 10:42 am

Just think of it as a long, dieselised Class 89!

Atomic Systems

Class Locos

Re: multiple unit query

Re: multiple unit query

Re: multiple unit query