Cambrian Signals

General MSTS related discussion that doesn't really fit into any of the other specific forums.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
RobertM
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5907
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 5:28 pm
Location: Centre of my own universe, where its scary

Post by RobertM »

Zackybong1 wrote:
RobertM wrote:Dayglower gets the idea, it's about time someone understood want I'm on about.
:D
Incase anyone missed it he said :evil:

'But there arn't any gantries!
The signals just float in mid-air!'
Eh-Eh... Calm down, Calm down.
Sorry.

But it is enoying because people are just saying that they were origanly going to be used and nothing about were I can find desent ones
User avatar
bigvern
Chief Track Welder
Posts: 7705
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Swindon, England

Post by bigvern »

The signals should certainly not float in mid-air, they are all on posts! A decision was made at the design stage not to use junction signals per se as at that time we were looking to put out Stage 2 which would add Shrewsbury to Machynlleth, at which point the signalling would have been completely re-worked. However the signals which are in use are all correctly and fully modelled. No one would be stupid enough to put out a commercial add pack with such a glaring error.

What detail level are you running at? If your display quality is at a lower setting it's possible the signal arms are displaying before the actual posts. Either that or there is a problem with your graphics card.
User avatar
Crosstie
Established Forum Member
Posts: 457
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: The Great Midwest

Post by Crosstie »

Ah, Vern, that's too bad. I didn't know about the Shrewsbury extension. That would have made a great route even greater.

Sorry to go off-topic.
Stu
---------------------------------------------
Now, if I could just remember how I did that......
peterholton
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 825
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Freelance modeller

Post by peterholton »

bigvern wrote:The signals should certainly not float in mid-air, they are all on posts! A decision was made at the design stage not to use junction signals per se as at that time we were looking to put out Stage 2 which would add Shrewsbury to Machynlleth, at which point the signalling would have been completely re-worked. However the signals which are in use are all correctly and fully modelled. No one would be stupid enough to put out a commercial add pack with such a glaring error.
Hi Vern,

No, the junction dolls are in there, because I scripted them: therefore they'll show as available in the RE if the basic .ref file is copied from the MSTS template folder. However, as we didn't use them, the gantries were stripped out. So, if the junction dolls are picked and placed in the RE, they'll certainly hang in midair. So, the answer is to download some suitable gantries, the GW ones should do, and place them under the dolls.

Peter
User avatar
rorz101uk
Established Forum Member
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 5:39 pm
Contact:

Post by rorz101uk »

bigvern wrote:The signals should certainly not float in mid-air, they are all on posts! A decision was made at the design stage not to use junction signals per se as at that time we were looking to put out Stage 2 which would add Shrewsbury to Machynlleth, at which point the signalling would have been completely re-worked. However the signals which are in use are all correctly and fully modelled. No one would be stupid enough to put out a commercial add pack with such a glaring error.

What detail level are you running at? If your display quality is at a lower setting it's possible the signal arms are displaying before the actual posts. Either that or there is a problem with your graphics card.
Will they do the Next add-ons pack of the Cambrain Route from Machynlleth to shrewsbusy? Then you can link the route on SVR2!
Thanks
Rory
GCR Passed Cleanner
http://rorysphotos.fotopic.net/
FM Rail Apprentice
Locked

Return to “[MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion”