AE Shop's BR Standard Class 4

General MSTS related discussion that doesn't really fit into any of the other specific forums.

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
sutton
Getting the hang of things now
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 6:41 pm

AE Shop's BR Standard Class 4

Post by sutton »

I hate to nag (i'm famous for it) but has anyone heard anything about Robin Howell's Standard 4 as i'm itching to see it. The standard 4s and 5s are by far my favourite classes and i'm surprised that there are none available to download. I'm surprised that Terry Thonton hasn't had a bash at a standard engine as he created the superb standard tank for SVR (and every other engine on that add on now I come to think of it).
User avatar
robin
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 518
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Northampton (originally Calne, Wilts)
Contact:

Post by robin »

The Class 4 is still in the works and I have a version that I have been running on my own system but it is not ready for upload. I am being a bit slow as I have been distracted by other things like getting back to my own model railway and making real world models. Another reason is that I have been a bit jaded and dissapointed at the moaning and bitching that has ocurred (and still does, by a minority perhaps) on this site. It has definately put me off uploading stock. I have a few things in a finished state but as yet haven't felt the urge to upload.
AE Shop (virtual) Carrage & Wagon Works.
GWR Locos & stock for MSTS.
http://www.aeshop.dsl.pipex.com last updated 07/03/05

So many Engines not enough time!
User avatar
sp762
Night Watchman
Posts: 4781
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Secret Route Builder's Castle - Ivory tower
Contact:

Post by sp762 »

Robin,

Standard 4's are a particular favourite of mine, and I'd love to see on uploaded. I've been in a similar boat to you recently, but I'm now ready to crack on again... it's just a timing thing.

It's occurred to me that the people who complain the loudest are the ones who don't upload anything themselves. Therefore, they don't really count, do they?

Looking forwarrd to the 4.
Image

Don't techno for an answer!
Proud to be a member of the Forums Moderation Team since 2002
User avatar
dforrest
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 12:00 am
Location: St. Vincent and the Grenadines (and in an earlier life, Hull)

Post by dforrest »

robin wrote:Another reason is that I have been a bit jaded and dissapointed at the moaning and bitching that has ocurred (and still does, by a minority perhaps) on this site. It has definately put me off uploading stock. I have a few things in a finished state but as yet haven't felt the urge to upload.
The foolishness of a few again results in a great loss to the majority.

.
User avatar
Christopher125
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2629
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Sandown, Isle of Wight (hooray!)

Post by Christopher125 »

Hi

I would love to see the Standard 4 be uploadd, I am sure that it will be as goodd, if not better, than all of your previous stuff, in which case it will be a treat indeed. It would be even better if could do a few quick generic industrials for colliery lines etc :wink: , and I can send you over some pics if you like :)

Chris 8)
User avatar
davidaward
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Post by davidaward »

Robin's is a 4MT 4-6-0.

The Mogul Varient, a completely new model will be represented on the ELR Route CD as 76079...............
Image
User avatar
longbow
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3608
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Noosa, Australia
Contact:

Post by longbow »

Robin - I'd love to see your Standard too. It would fill a big gap in the MSTS steam roster.
User avatar
mattcarey
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1393
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 8:19 pm
Location: Plymouth
Contact:

Post by mattcarey »

i would love to see it as well. It's one of my favourite locos.

Regards

Matthew :wink:
Image
Locked

Return to “[MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion”