Comparing the reliabity of builders

General MSTS related discussion that doesn't really fit into any of the other specific forums.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Zackybong1
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1591
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2002 10:19 am
Location: SHED CODE 30E

Post by Zackybong1 »

Thats easy. The I.O.W. is an olde worlde sort of place and need olde worlde trains!! :D :wink:
IWCRLY
Getting the hang of things now
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 4:24 pm

Isle of Wight, last new stock.

Post by IWCRLY »

The last time the islands railways had any new stock was in 1906 when the Isle of Wight Central Railway Company bought a steam railmotor. A quantity of new wagons were sent by the Southern Railway during the 1920's.
Of the island companies only the Isle of Wight Railway Co regularly bought new locomotives and stock, even they bought only second hand in later years.
During Southern and British Railways days the practice was quite sensibly to use old stock displaced from elsewhere, this has often resulted in the island using the oldest stock or locomotives in service at any particular time, or indeed the last of class or type.

Pete
User avatar
Stooopidperson
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6947
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2002 2:51 pm
Location: Planet Stooopid (5 Earth seconds=1 Stooopid day)

Re: Isle of Wight, last new stock.

Post by Stooopidperson »

IWCRLY wrote:During Southern and British Railways days the practice was quite sensibly to use old stock displaced from elsewhere, this has often resulted in the island using the oldest stock or locomotives in service at any particular time, or indeed the last of class or type.
But why use old stock? And why use tube stock? Why not use old mainline trains instead?
If you were wondering, the avatar is me on Planet Stooopid...
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Re: Isle of Wight, last new stock.

Post by buffy500 »

Stooopidperson wrote:why use old stock? And why use tube stock? Why not use old mainline trains instead?
Because there is a tunnel just after Ryde Town that is too small for mainline stock.
Image
mattvince
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1739
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:48 pm

Post by mattvince »

Well, the Ryde Esplanade Tunnel WAS big enough for main-line stock, or O2 0-4-4Ts anyway, however, a slight problem with water was the cause of all problems, namely that the tunnels leaked, and, in spite of the best attempts at pumping them out, BR took the decision to raise the floor to avoid shorting out the DC rail (most of the time), thus precluding the use of main-line stock north of St John's Road. So 1923 stock arrived, second-hand.

I believe a town-centre route will be chosen if the LRT conversion ever occurs. Personally the IoW should become an island railway paradise - a sort of Jurassic Park for trains - oh, it already is!
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

mattvince wrote:Personally the IoW should become an island railway paradise - a sort of Jurassic Park for trains - oh, it already is!
Almost all preserved railways run newer trains than Island line.
Image
Locked

Return to “[MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion”