Front Coupler Fix
Moderator: Moderators
-
isambardkingdombrunel
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2350
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2001 12:00 am
-
isambardkingdombrunel
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2350
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2001 12:00 am
-
MartinH
- Not a TooMuchTime user if his girlfriend asks!
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 12:00 am
I've just written and tested several Skipton activities with extensive front coupler use and only one crash. I also used the front coupler a fair bit on the Cambrian and only encountered a few problems. It all comes down to the coupler settings. I've even written a set of shunting activities for the Skipton route based around the lime works at Stainforth in which you are repeatedly required to pick up wagons with the front coupling. I tested these activities several times without a single problem.
Martin
Martin
- Zackybong1
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2002 10:19 am
- Location: SHED CODE 30E
-
isambardkingdombrunel
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2350
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2001 12:00 am
I didn't reccomend it ,i just posted the link for information.A lot more goes on over at train-sim.com technically,so i thought someone may be interested in whats happening with the front coupler issue.
Personally ,i use the the m/s parameter in my damper values for the couplings and that cures 99.99999% of breaking problems.
IKB.
Personally ,i use the the m/s parameter in my damper values for the couplings and that cures 99.99999% of breaking problems.
IKB.
I have tried both the hacks found at http://www.train-sim.com/dcforum/DCForumID3/18998.html and find the front coupling crashes very frequently after installing each in turn. The same sadly is true whether the 'fixes' are applied or whether I revert to the original default.wag- crash, crash, crash all too frequently. Different users seem to report varying experiences here, though I have no idea what is causing the diversity.
Mark
Mark
- dforrest
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 6187
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: St. Vincent and the Grenadines (and in an earlier life, Hull)
What fix did you use? I am having repeated probelms with your, and other, activities on the Skipton Carlisle CD.MartinH wrote:I've just written and tested several Skipton activities with extensive front coupler use and only one crash. I also used the front coupler a fair bit on the Cambrian and only encountered a few problems. It all comes down to the coupler settings. I've even written a set of shunting activities for the Skipton route based around the lime works at Stainforth in which you are repeatedly required to pick up wagons with the front coupling. I tested these activities several times without a single problem.
Martin
.
-
isambardkingdombrunel
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2350
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2001 12:00 am
You may be interested to know that even using a different track texture on a route can cause problems with front couplers.
Now as bizarre as that may seem ,i proved it to myself with regards to Pat`s Skipton 1920`s route.
In that i changed all 5 textures relating to track\tunnels from Pat`s default to the KHP2 files.
After doing this i had many problems with coupling to consists,even violently bouncing off wagons and shooting them and loco up in the air.
I reverted back to the supplied track\tunnel textures and everything worked like clockwork.I did not modify,change or tweak anything else.
Now as bizarre as that may seem ,i proved it to myself with regards to Pat`s Skipton 1920`s route.
In that i changed all 5 textures relating to track\tunnels from Pat`s default to the KHP2 files.
After doing this i had many problems with coupling to consists,even violently bouncing off wagons and shooting them and loco up in the air.
I reverted back to the supplied track\tunnel textures and everything worked like clockwork.I did not modify,change or tweak anything else.
- alan2
- Peak Rail Route Author
- Posts: 5512
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Secret Routebuilders Castle lost on the way to the toilet!
Now I noticed something the other week Mike.
The Default textures for S+C Default route are 512X512. But the "new" ones are 256X256 plus some of the other routes use 256X256 as well. So it may be a texture size problem ?
Will have to try and get a coupling problem now
Can honestly say I (as in me personnally) have not experienced the problem. 
Since the patch anyway.
The Default textures for S+C Default route are 512X512. But the "new" ones are 256X256 plus some of the other routes use 256X256 as well. So it may be a texture size problem ?
Will have to try and get a coupling problem now
Since the patch anyway.
Alan Heath
Why does DOS never Say Excelent Command or filename ?!!?!??
To Err is human, computers output the errors at higher speed.
Why does DOS never Say Excelent Command or filename ?!!?!??
To Err is human, computers output the errors at higher speed.
-
isambardkingdombrunel
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2350
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2001 12:00 am
I did not know that Alan (about the texture sizes). Not being a modeller stuff like that doesn't interest me,it either works or doesn't.
I think you might have something there though,because like yourself i haven't experienced any coupler problems since installing the 1.1 update.
Untill i did this track texture swap on Pat`s route,i had gone months without encountering any coupler hickups,particularly after moding all my own stock to use the /s set up in the coupler damping values.
I think you might have something there though,because like yourself i haven't experienced any coupler problems since installing the 1.1 update.
Untill i did this track texture swap on Pat`s route,i had gone months without encountering any coupler hickups,particularly after moding all my own stock to use the /s set up in the coupler damping values.
- alan2
- Peak Rail Route Author
- Posts: 5512
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Secret Routebuilders Castle lost on the way to the toilet!
in the Coupler setup there is a value for break which is set-up for n/m
eg.
now the modified version will be. : ---
eg.
Code: Select all
Coupling (
Type ( Automatic )
Spring (
Stiffness ( 1e6N/m 5e6N/m )
Damping ( 1e6N/m 1e6N/m )
Break ( 1.1e7N 1.1e7N )
r0 ( 20cm 30cm )
)
Velocity ( 0.1m/s )
)
Code: Select all
Coupling (
Type ( Automatic )
Spring (
Stiffness ( 1e6N/m 5e6N/m )
Damping ( 1e6N/m/s 1e6N/m/s )
Break ( 1.1e7N 1.1e7N )
r0 ( 20cm 30cm )
)
Velocity ( 0.1m/s )
)
Last edited by alan2 on Sun Jul 27, 2003 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Alan Heath
Why does DOS never Say Excelent Command or filename ?!!?!??
To Err is human, computers output the errors at higher speed.
Why does DOS never Say Excelent Command or filename ?!!?!??
To Err is human, computers output the errors at higher speed.