Indacator Signals \ Installing Can't Install PLEASE HELP

johncas · Post by **johncas** » Tue Mar 11, 2003 11:49 pm

I have tried to install the indacator signals on to the default Settle and Carlisle Route with the default signals I have added the Signal dat files but came with the Indacator signals pack to the default Settle and Carlisle signal Dat files but I get error messages like faild to read signal dat file line 47 etc I can't fix this

So could someone please e-mail me a working signal dat file which has the default Settle and Carlisle signals and the indactors signals pack signal dat files added so I can use the pack thank you

If someone has already done this and has the pack working on the default settle - carlisle route can they send me the sig dat files thank you very mutch for takeing your time to do this and reply to this post

snowcrashandy · Post by **snowcrashandy** » Tue Mar 11, 2003 11:52 pm

MUCH EASIER IF YOU COULD HAVE A SMALLER SIGNATURE JOHN

johncas · Post by **johncas** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 12:26 am

Yes the sigs being sorted out

And like thsy say If you are not going to reply about the post subject then don't reply atall

Cobos · Post by **Cobos** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 12:37 am

John, I posted in the route building forum and I'll ask the same here. Have you changed the numbers for signaltype, signalshapes, etc. That said though, I tried updating the S&C files and came up with an error also. I could send you my signal files as I use the indicators. You would have to add the semiphore signals to them though. I don't have them in my files.

Kerr

TFormoso · Post by **TFormoso** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 8:53 am

I have posted a reply on the other thread.

This is just to add, I have also tested adding the Indicator Signal pack to the Settle & Carlisle Route. I religiously followed the instructions in the manual, to make sure there were no mistakes and there were no problems. It worked first time. (For the test the S & C Route was as delivered from the CD)

Tony

Zackybong1 · Post by **Zackybong1** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 10:59 am

johncas wrote: And like thsy say If you are not going to reply about the post subject then don't reply atall

Who says?
I haven't heard this before. Some of my most enjoyable moments on these forums have been with great people doing precisely that. Alright we try to stay fairly close to the plot, but, sometimes etiquette needs ponting out, and massive banners etc. need pointing out by somebody.

I've given you enough subtle hints too.

buffy500 · Post by **buffy500** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 11:14 am

You have been asked many times to reduce the size, if you don't take the hint then expect people to keep making it.

Fodda · Post by **Fodda** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 3:19 pm

Hear hear Dave. I even made a smaller version of his banner for him but got totally ignored. I thinks he's trying to provoke a reaction like a troll. I just ignore his posts now.

buffy500 · Post by **buffy500** » Wed Mar 12, 2003 3:41 pm

Gary,

Looking at the banner, it looks like it is a real low res version stretched up to be big anyway.
So all that space wasted and it still look terrible, whats the logic in that ?
And whats the logic of double posting the same question in multiple forums ?

Atomic Systems

Indacator Signals \ Installing Can't Install PLEASE HELP

Indacator Signals \ Installing Can't Install PLEASE HELP

Yes

Re: Yes