I had a thought the other day, (yeah dangerous i know)
Would it actually be possible to set up and run a seperate railway cut-off from the national network at your own speed limits using your own stock. Running both passenger and freight traffic for an operational profit like the former BR?
Are there any laws/ect against it? could it be done.........
Dont get me wrong, it wouldnt be a preserved line, but a seperate railway with business in mind and payed staff.
I wonder if it could be done.......
Private Rail
Moderator: Moderators
-
Goingnorth
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:00 am
It can be done and has been done. In effect Heathrow express is run as a 'standalone' operator. Even though it use NR tracks and signalling.
There's also a proposal from Central railways, concerning opening the old GC main line.
I think though you would find that the SRA may stick it's nose in and by law the HMRI have to do inspections. Many preserved railways actually offer 'serious' services. And for all intents and purposes they are commercial railways, in fact more so the rest of the railway network which tends to be subsidised.
There's also a proposal from Central railways, concerning opening the old GC main line.
I think though you would find that the SRA may stick it's nose in and by law the HMRI have to do inspections. Many preserved railways actually offer 'serious' services. And for all intents and purposes they are commercial railways, in fact more so the rest of the railway network which tends to be subsidised.
- martinhodgson
- Nowt to brag about, but still want to look flashy!
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Manchester
- Contact:
-
yourdomingo
- Established Forum Member
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:09 am
- Location: A scabby council flat in east London.
- Contact:
the epping and ongar railway is only allowed to exist because if they ever get going they'll have to run commuter trains.
it would be possible to basically build a new railway network in this country. it's what happened between 1830 and 1900 isn't it, really?
it'd be very, very expensive and unless you were super super super ultra mega rich, you'd need funding from somewhere. it could probably be don without the SRA, but obviously the SRA would be involved.
similar operation is probably Tyne & Wear Metro (though i believe that uses Network Rail tracks for some of it)
snowdon railway? never preserved or nationalised
it would be possible to basically build a new railway network in this country. it's what happened between 1830 and 1900 isn't it, really?
it'd be very, very expensive and unless you were super super super ultra mega rich, you'd need funding from somewhere. it could probably be don without the SRA, but obviously the SRA would be involved.
similar operation is probably Tyne & Wear Metro (though i believe that uses Network Rail tracks for some of it)
snowdon railway? never preserved or nationalised
-
Goingnorth
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:00 am
I don't think it has to be ever so expensive. It never fails to amaze me just how well preserved railways do. There's are loads of them. I just think the 'serious' railway is very bad at managing costs. A lot of the money goes out of compensation costs to TOCs for example for upgrading their network!
Rather than open old lines, it's a shame some of the preservation fraternity don't propose to take over some scenic rural lines and run heritage equipment in the summer.
At present I think the industry is incredibly over regulated, and if anything, that's what's killing it off. It's crazy, because passenger demand has never been higher.
Why the government is so scared of looking at the structure and getting rid of the some of the heavy regulation got only knows. Obviously job creation. Did you know that the SRA has more people working for it the BR HQ did? And, they don't actually run the railway as such.
Anyway, if you fancy having a go at the real thing, join one of the preservation movements.
Rather than open old lines, it's a shame some of the preservation fraternity don't propose to take over some scenic rural lines and run heritage equipment in the summer.
At present I think the industry is incredibly over regulated, and if anything, that's what's killing it off. It's crazy, because passenger demand has never been higher.
Why the government is so scared of looking at the structure and getting rid of the some of the heavy regulation got only knows. Obviously job creation. Did you know that the SRA has more people working for it the BR HQ did? And, they don't actually run the railway as such.
Anyway, if you fancy having a go at the real thing, join one of the preservation movements.
- salopiangrowler
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 7796
- Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 8:56 pm
- Location: Shrewsbury
- Contact:
- Fodda
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 6157
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Bristol, England
I imagine it would be next to impossible to create a second network... It was all very well in the 19th century when there were a lot fewer roads and no other national network... But there'd have to be so many bridges and/or tunnels so that the networks didn't affect each other that a whole seperate network is pretty well a non-starter from the word go.
There you are... Even if money were no object, I doubt very much that it's feasible in this small country. Now if it were the USA or Australia... maybe...
There you are... Even if money were no object, I doubt very much that it's feasible in this small country. Now if it were the USA or Australia... maybe...