gswindale wrote:We have moved somewhat off-topic have we not?
Errr ...my topic actually and no. We've extended a facet of my post.
gswindale wrote:But then if I want an act for LSE, rather than simply looking through one list of activities, I'd have to plough through various other categories.
I'd rather have all acts for one route listed together; with a decent description and related files attached all neat & tidily.
????
Well I don't see your point Geoff? For a start the detail in the description varies from a small novelette

through to barely sufficient
There are
already acts under 3 different headings and they all contain a mixture of activities.
My suggestion was to create sub categories that
actually meant something. If you have LSE and you have the BATS Southern Region stock then you'd know that acts listed under that heading required both without having to read the detail.
If you like modern stuff then you'd know that the categories for any act other than modern were not what you're after?
I'm merely suggesting a logic to sub categories that isn't there right now? How can that be more difficult?
To try and make it Clearer?
Sub categories
LSE activities for MT LSE stock ONLY.
LSE activities for MT LSE stock AND BATS Southern Region Stock
LSE activities MODERN era
LSE activities STEAM and Earlier era.
but I guess you'd have to add
LSE activities for MT LSE stock with additional freeware downloads
Many of us have BATS stock packs and many activities were written for routes using these. Highlighting acts that use them would immediately identify them as not being of use to those who don't own them.
I'm NOT suggesting re-cataloguing the entire file library. THAT would be a massive task!
Ruf you're right about withdrawn stock. It's a pain. Seems an unnecessary and petty act to me? My opinion anyway.
If we'd ever sorted out permissions we could just modify the affected acts and update them. Trouble is folk spend hours sorting out acts and obviously they want to keep editorial control. Whilst folk are allowed to withdraw stuff though we're in a "lose, lose situation".
Why am I looking at this now?
Well like many of us who've been involved from the start I'm on about my fourth computer and having to start from square one I'm looking to create as error free a set up as possible. My last stable install that ran for a number of years finally corrupted and refused to run MSTS at all. No errors were reported but before I had a chance to delve further the disc corrupted and I had to walk away ....to get a perspective. Unlike many folk I don't subscribe to new is always best. BATS, MT and 3DTS stuff will always have a place on any MSTS install I have and I'm sure that doesn't make me unique? Trouble is as stuff gets older and major players dissappear off the radar we need to make it easier for newcomers to join in? as well as make this task easier?
Geoff