Add On Announcement

The Rail Simulator forum was very busy leading up to the UK release on October 12th 2007, this is a read-only copy of those discussions for historic and review purposes.

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
mickoo737
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:10 am
Location: Felixstowe
Contact:

Post by mickoo737 »

timbooth wrote:
Also, KRS are licencing add-ons, not routes -
Not true, there licensing addons, that includes any commercial addon, specifically routes and loco packs etc, thats not rumour, thats fact.

If you make anything commercial, your going to have to get a license, which makes Verns point doubly interesting where sites like UKTS have a CD payment system for freeware, technically thats a commercial venture,.... though with little profit if any...., money still changes hands for goods and that makes it commercial.
User avatar
bluearrow
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 11:32 pm
Location: Worcestershire.
Contact:

Post by bluearrow »

3DTrains wrote:Sorry - I didn't mean for it to sound like sour grapes, just that I found it odd that those I know well over here haven't been contacted. :P

Cheers!
Marc - 3DTrains
http://www.3dtrains.com
Well Marc, we live here and we have not been contacted. Quite frankly though until the product is proven and we read the feedback, we shall continue to build for MSTS, for as long as folks want us to.
Best Wishes :wink:

Mike

BluearrowTS
http://www.bluearrowts.com
User avatar
johndibben
Bletchley Park:home of first programmable computer
Posts: 14007
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Bletchley

Post by johndibben »

mickoo737 wrote:
timbooth wrote:
Also, KRS are licencing add-ons, not routes -
Not true, there licensing addons, that includes any commercial addon, specifically routes and loco packs etc, thats not rumour, thats fact.
Also, KRS are licencing add-ons, not routes - they can't do anything about freeware routes that happen to duplicate commercial ones.
Even I can see Tim was referring to commercial add-ons which includes routes and loco' packs and opposed to freeware routes.

This appears to be becoming an obsession whereby reading is apparrantly impaired.

Most of those with problems are those closely associated with a preferred sim who's developers have failed to make clear it's future and logic dictates that must affect be a factor when developing another sim.

As such the situation could change overnight and Kuju arn't silly.

Cheers

John
User avatar
bluearrow
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 11:32 pm
Location: Worcestershire.
Contact:

Post by bluearrow »

mickoo737 wrote:
timbooth wrote:
Also, KRS are licencing add-ons, not routes -
Not true, there licensing addons, that includes any commercial addon, specifically routes and loco packs etc, thats not rumour, thats fact.

If you make anything commercial, your going to have to get a license, which makes Verns point doubly interesting where sites like UKTS have a CD payment system for freeware, technically thats a commercial venture,.... though with little profit if any...., money still changes hands for goods and that makes it commercial.
Then there is the question of the £1,000 advance from the commercials!
Best Wishes :wink:

Mike

BluearrowTS
http://www.bluearrowts.com
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

bluearrow wrote:
mickoo737 wrote:
timbooth wrote:
Also, KRS are licencing add-ons, not routes -
Not true, there licensing addons, that includes any commercial addon, specifically routes and loco packs etc, thats not rumour, thats fact.

If you make anything commercial, your going to have to get a license, which makes Verns point doubly interesting where sites like UKTS have a CD payment system for freeware, technically thats a commercial venture,.... though with little profit if any...., money still changes hands for goods and that makes it commercial.
Then there is the question of the £1,000 advance from the commercials!
Is that confirmed? I don't know anything about the economics of these things, but all the commercial developers have been making money (OK, not a lot of it from what I've heard, not enough to make it a full-time day job, but money nonetheless) from Kuju's previous work. It's fair enough that they (or maybe it's EA) want a slice of that pie this time around. The details are sufficiently sketchy that perhaps the commercial developers might even get a better deal this time, if for instance Kuju take on the distributor's role and take that slice of the pie. Don't forget that it's in Kuju's best interests that add-ons are produced and sold, so broadly speaking they must be on the same "side" as add-on developers.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
mickoo737
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:10 am
Location: Felixstowe
Contact:

Post by mickoo737 »

johndibben wrote:
Most of those with problems are those closely associated with a preferred sim who's developers have failed to make clear it's future and logic dictates that must affect be a factor when developing another sim.

Cheers

John
Now who's putting words into peoples mouths !, the only one here with a connection to TMTS....lets have it out in the open and then there's no obsessive impaired reading mistakes !...is Marc Nelson, since TMTS died everyone else was 'laid' off. Now on that score l see several others who are not happy with the current proposal, the majority of which were 'never ' involved with TMTS at all, so your summation is in short preposterous and can only be nothing but a diversionary tactic.

You can also be rest assured that all 'those' so called associates of TMTS would also scream blue murder if TMTS every tried to pull the same licensing stunt that Kuju are trying on.

You'll also find that all those commercial teams....or old boys school as you insistently prefer to use....that joined TMTS, did so through choice as that was the preferred set up they felt was best for there situations, in other words they voted with there feet. There was a choice of two sims and they chose the better one, simple as that.

But since you insist, as per usual, in dragging up the past, we all now have to wander through all that . again, as though there was all some hidden meaning to it..

And you have the gaul to accuse others of impaired reading ?.

You write with the proclaimed innocence off just seeing a game you can play, but to be frank a fair few do wonder at your agenda, so lets just leave agendas aside for at least one thread for a change, then l'm sure every one will get along just fine.
mickoo737
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:10 am
Location: Felixstowe
Contact:

Post by mickoo737 »

arabiandisco wrote:
bluearrow wrote:
mickoo737 wrote: Not true, there licensing addons, that includes any commercial addon, specifically routes and loco packs etc, thats not rumour, thats fact.

If you make anything commercial, your going to have to get a license, which makes Verns point doubly interesting where sites like UKTS have a CD payment system for freeware, technically thats a commercial venture,.... though with little profit if any...., money still changes hands for goods and that makes it commercial.
Then there is the question of the £1,000 advance from the commercials!
Is that confirmed? I don't know anything about the economics of these things, but all the commercial developers have been making money (OK, not a lot of it from what I've heard, not enough to make it a full-time day job, but money nonetheless) from Kuju's previous work. It's fair enough that they (or maybe it's EA) want a slice of that pie this time around. The details are sufficiently sketchy that perhaps the commercial developers might even get a better deal this time, if for instance Kuju take on the distributor's role and take that slice of the pie. Don't forget that it's in Kuju's best interests that add-ons are produced and sold, so broadly speaking they must be on the same "side" as add-on developers.
The banded figure is not confirmed by fact yet, however every other banded rumour has become true in one guise or another, thus theres little evidence to support this one being the odd man out, if you were a betting man then you couldnt get better odds on this track record.

As for Kuju shipping, that wont help developers one iota, they already pay shippers and producers to do that, all you do is swap one production body for another, that means that the likes of Contact Sales and Just Trains are out of business, and thats another rumor thats flying around as well, anyone want to take bets on that one now ??, no l didnt think so !.

To clarify that rumoured figure, thats per addon ( route or stock JB ! ), not pre tools kit, in other words the more addons you produce the more you pay, unlike other set ups where you pay a one off ' tools joining fee' for want of a better term.

As for making money, well thats a null conversation really, short of publishing our bank accounts, no one here ( other than those actually doing it ) is going to believe a word you speak, but for the record and since l've nothing to hide or gain my monthly return for EH1, Thompson, Gresley, Peppercorn, Southern and Fires & wires is £8-12 a month and its been like that for a good 18 months.

The only people who make real money are the publishers and if Kuju are now doing that side as well then there going to get all that money....and the license fee as well, double whammy really, perhaps now some might see why commercials think this is all bad cricket old sprot ?, but then again maybe not as UKTS is well known for its hard core freeware rules, sod the commercials clientel.
User avatar
bigvern
Chief Track Welder
Posts: 7705
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Swindon, England

Post by bigvern »

johndibben wrote: Vern's always been in 'no-mans land' and no doubt would be with any sim having tried Trainz at one point :D

John
Not quite sure what is meant by that either, nor does it seem to be particularly true. 6 or was it 7 freeware and a hand in 2 payware routes for MSTS would indicate a certain amount of commitment don't you think?

If a sim is any good and worth producing content for then I might have a go then again I might prefer to spend my time playing GTA San Andreas. Trainz p'ed me off partly because of the attitude of certain people involved with their so called community, partly because I think Auran are ripping people off by constantly trying to convince the emperor he has new clothes but most importantly because, at the end of the day, it just ain't that good as an operational sim.

However that's really beside the point, we are dealing with KRS here and the issues the licencing announcement have raised. I've done freeware and commercial work, both have pros and cons though I can certainly attest that the money to be made in selling add-ons does not justify a four figure sum up front. (Especially if the end audience is much smaller than that for MSTS).

dkightley
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 9802
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 8:52 pm

Post by dkightley »


Come on, gentlemen. Let's not get too heated about things. I know this is a very important subject, so let's keep things nice and calm and polite.



Doug
User avatar
johndibben
Bletchley Park:home of first programmable computer
Posts: 14007
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Bletchley

Post by johndibben »

bigvern wrote:
johndibben wrote: Vern's always been in 'no-mans land' and no doubt would be with any sim having tried Trainz at one point :D

John
Not quite sure what is meant by that either, nor does it seem to be particularly true. 6 or was it 7 freeware and a hand in 2 payware routes for MSTS would indicate a certain amount of commitment don't you think?
I was sympathising with you, the P&P argument that droned on and on and you appeared to fall foul of all sides at some point in time.

It meant exactly as it read.
Last edited by johndibben on Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
johndibben
Bletchley Park:home of first programmable computer
Posts: 14007
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Bletchley

Post by johndibben »

mickoo737 wrote:You write with the proclaimed innocence off just seeing a game you can play, but to be frank a fair few do wonder at your agenda, so lets just leave agendas aside for at least one thread for a change, then l'm sure every one will get along just fine.
Oo .... I've got an agenda! :D

Hope it's one where I make loads of money or become very important.

Cheers

John
Last edited by johndibben on Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
timbooth
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1643
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Walsall, UK

Post by timbooth »

mickoo737 wrote:
timbooth wrote:
Also, KRS are licencing add-ons, not routes -
Not true, there licensing addons, that includes any commercial addon, specifically routes and loco packs etc, thats not rumour, thats fact.

If you make anything commercial, your going to have to get a license, which makes Verns point doubly interesting where sites like UKTS have a CD payment system for freeware, technically thats a commercial venture,.... though with little profit if any...., money still changes hands for goods and that makes it commercial.
Sorry, I worded that badly - its commercial addons they licencing, not the rights to create specific routes. They can't stop freeware developers replicating a route that is being developed or already exists. They may though control which products commercial developers want to develop, if it overlaps/duplicates another commercial product thats either being developed or already released.

I'm not sure about the UKTS CD situation, but its possible UKTS would have the requirement to obtain approval - and pay any fees as appropriate. It may only mean a quid or so extra on a CD at most, we will just have to see.
Last edited by timbooth on Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mickoo737
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:10 am
Location: Felixstowe
Contact:

Post by mickoo737 »

johndibben wrote:
mickoo737 wrote:You write with the proclaimed innocence off just seeing a game you can play, but to be frank a fair few do wonder at your agenda, so lets just leave agendas aside for at least one thread for a change, then l'm sure every one will get along just fine.
Oo .... I've got an agenda! :D

Hope it's one where I make loads of monay or become very important.

Cheers

John
Good, we are agreed then ?, right lets move on with the real issue, aka Kujus proposed license structure.
mickoo737
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:10 am
Location: Felixstowe
Contact:

Post by mickoo737 »

timbooth wrote:
mickoo737 wrote:
timbooth wrote:
Also, KRS are licencing add-ons, not routes -
Not true, there licensing addons, that includes any commercial addon, specifically routes and loco packs etc, thats not rumour, thats fact.

If you make anything commercial, your going to have to get a license, which makes Verns point doubly interesting where sites like UKTS have a CD payment system for freeware, technically thats a commercial venture,.... though with little profit if any...., money still changes hands for goods and that makes it commercial.
Sorry, I worded that badly - its commercial addons they licencing, not the rights to create specific routes. They can't stop freeware developers replicating a route that is being developed or already exists. They may though control which products commercial developers want to develop, if it overlaps/duplicates another commercial product thats either being developed or already released.

I'm not sure about the UKTS CD situation, but its possible UKTS would have the requirement to obtain approval - and pay any fees as appropriate. It may only mean a quid or so extra on a CD at most, we will just have to see.
Tim,

No problem, with hind sight my further clarificatin wasnt really needed.

Best

Michael
User avatar
johndibben
Bletchley Park:home of first programmable computer
Posts: 14007
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Bletchley

Post by johndibben »

mickoo737 wrote: Good, we are agreed then ?, right lets move on with the real issue, aka Kujus proposed license structure.
I would earnestly urge that on the licensing issue, commercials deal with Kuju directly as from where I'm sitting it really doesn't look as if anyone's coming out of this smelling of roses by debating it on a public forum.

No reply will be a reply in itself.

This thread is concerned with the latest Kuju announcement which covers numerous issues.

The welcome news regarding freeware is paramount on UKTS as many of us were concerned and little more rejoicing about that would improve the tone.

If I have an agenda it is that UKTS continues to be able to do that which it did the day I joined.

That has never changed and there is no better place than this thread where many of a similar mind can express their opinions on a subject which directly affects UKTS but only if they're allowed to do so.

Cheers

John
Locked

Return to “[RS] Pre-release Discussions”