Matrox Triple Head To Go
Moderator: Moderators
- longbow
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3608
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Noosa, Australia
- Contact:
Matrox Triple Head To Go
As it seems this multi-screen enabler will be supported by RS Upgrade 2, any thoughts from existing Matrox users as to whether this quite costly add-on will be worth having?
- RSderek
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 4760
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:19 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
That is a classy set up Adam has there...

To contact me email support@railsimulator.com, not here.
So long, and thanks for all the fish.
http://dereksiddle.blogspot.com/
So long, and thanks for all the fish.
http://dereksiddle.blogspot.com/
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
Looks good but a bit stretched.
And what settings it being run at, im guessing full
I tried it on mine using Boot camp and works but frame rate is really lagging
And what settings it being run at, im guessing full
I tried it on mine using Boot camp and works but frame rate is really lagging
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
Tried it already?? Support for triple monitors has only been available for about 30minutes!
- Easilyconfused
- Worried about Silent Chickens
- Posts: 13205
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 9:06 am
- Location: Portsmouth & Bristol
- Contact:
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
Correct me if I am wrong but is Bootcamp a way of running Windows on Apple hardware i.e. some sort of emulator ? http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/bootcamp.htmlJunGRail wrote:Looks good but a bit stretched.
And what settings it being run at, im guessing full
I tried it on mine using Boot camp and works but frame rate is really lagging
If so then why would you expect a high performance Windows application to work correctly ? I have used similar tools like VMware to run Unix and other applications on top of the range PC hardware and the performance sucked.
Kindest regards
John Lewis
Member of the forum moderation team
John Lewis
Member of the forum moderation team
-
raildumper
- Getting the hang of things now
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:40 am
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
That's nice having 3 screens for RS. I have 2 but i can't get them to work in dual mode. The main screen is a 17" one, with a max resolution of 1280x1024, the second one is 15" and 1024x768. How should i set them up?
It would be nice if all windows like F3, F4, F5... could be moved to the smaller screen, having the main screen clean with only the cab view. Is that possible?
Greetings
Manuel
It would be nice if all windows like F3, F4, F5... could be moved to the smaller screen, having the main screen clean with only the cab view. Is that possible?
Greetings
Manuel
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
I think thay all need to be the same resolution 
- longbow
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3608
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Noosa, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
Don't think so. As far as I can see both Matrox and the RS dual window option merely spread the RS image over multiple screensIt would be nice if all windows like F3, F4, F5... could be moved to the smaller screen, having the main screen clean with only the cab view. Is that possible?
- nwallace
- Creator of fantasy routes that exist in his mind
- Posts: 3418
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Secret Route Builders Castle Retirement Home (Fictional Wing)
- Contact:
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
Looking at those screen shots of Adams the one of the interior shows a problem, it's stretched that to fit and then Adam has angled it in so it looks almost daft. Ideally you would have a huge wide-screen monitor and the appropriate camera angle
Failing that the next best is the 3 monitions on the same horizontal plane and the software set up to show that or set and known angles and the screen rendered based on that, I reckon the later is asking a fair bit.
---------------------------------------
http://www.NiallWallace.co.uk
Pining for Windows for Workgroups 3.11
http://www.NiallWallace.co.uk
Pining for Windows for Workgroups 3.11
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
Hiya,
Sorry that the images arent that great Overmarze. It is true that still images on mis-matched monitors dont really do the feature justice. I'll try and get some Youtube videos up of the setup using matching monitors. It is a cool feature that really adds to the experience if you can do it.
Sorry that the images arent that great Overmarze. It is true that still images on mis-matched monitors dont really do the feature justice. I'll try and get some Youtube videos up of the setup using matching monitors. It is a cool feature that really adds to the experience if you can do it.
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
Is there anyway we can have tripple view on 1 moniter lol thats a stupid queston i bet 
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
Celotape and black paper......
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
It is possoble then? lol
-
NeutronIC
- Atomic Systems Team

- Posts: 11085
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: E11, London, England
- Contact:
Re: Matrox Triple Head To Go
Just for clarification, will this feature work with dual output video cards or is it just for single outputs running through splitters like the triple head to go unit?
I have a dual monitor set-up at home and when I tried this I was quite confused about how to set it up - they are not the same resolution (one is 17" 4:3 and the other is 20" 16:9) so none of the available resolutions made any sense and when i tried one and set it to 2x1 monitor set-up I just ended up with a quarter sized rail sim window squeezed in to the center left of the main screen, ignoring the second screen entirely.
It also couldn't let me tell it where the screen was relatively - i.e. my primary screen is on the right with the secondary on the left, which I believe means that zero coordinate is going to be in the middle of the "virtual" screen where if the primary was on the left then zero would be on the very left.
Am I right in thinking that you can only use a single output, on to which you create a big screen and leave it up to the matrox to split in to multiple monitors, then the monitor configuration (2x1 etc) is what then lets you cut that big screen up in to multiple displays?
If that *is* the case then I really do have to wonder why the effort was spent on it since there are probably five people out there with Rail Sim and a Matrox splitter.
If it isn't the case and dual output graphics cards work, then if the problem is that it requires matched resolutions then again that seems to me to be a rather silly design decision - most people with dual monitors will have got the second one to upgrade the first and simply hooked the original one up because they can, so probably only another five people who have a suitable configuration to make the feature work.
Can you shed some light on this please Adam or Derek?
Regards
Matt.
I have a dual monitor set-up at home and when I tried this I was quite confused about how to set it up - they are not the same resolution (one is 17" 4:3 and the other is 20" 16:9) so none of the available resolutions made any sense and when i tried one and set it to 2x1 monitor set-up I just ended up with a quarter sized rail sim window squeezed in to the center left of the main screen, ignoring the second screen entirely.
It also couldn't let me tell it where the screen was relatively - i.e. my primary screen is on the right with the secondary on the left, which I believe means that zero coordinate is going to be in the middle of the "virtual" screen where if the primary was on the left then zero would be on the very left.
Am I right in thinking that you can only use a single output, on to which you create a big screen and leave it up to the matrox to split in to multiple monitors, then the monitor configuration (2x1 etc) is what then lets you cut that big screen up in to multiple displays?
If that *is* the case then I really do have to wonder why the effort was spent on it since there are probably five people out there with Rail Sim and a Matrox splitter.
If it isn't the case and dual output graphics cards work, then if the problem is that it requires matched resolutions then again that seems to me to be a rather silly design decision - most people with dual monitors will have got the second one to upgrade the first and simply hooked the original one up because they can, so probably only another five people who have a suitable configuration to make the feature work.
Can you shed some light on this please Adam or Derek?
Regards
Matt.


