Doesn't help with all the other 'forelock tuggers' posting..bigvern wrote: It's a relief to see RSDL acknowledging the concerns but rather than tugging my forelock in hero worship at a bit of banter, as someone who paid £35 for a game now sitting unused after just over a week due to the large number of flaws and bugs some real answers on the many issues (and when we might see a patch) would be more appreciated.
If you look back a few posts you will see Dereks reply to a general post.
Basically there's a denial of the problems (along with banter)..........so I fear we won't get very far this way.
What I cannot currently see is what is trying to be achieved...... buying some breathing space ?
My biggest worry is how long can this game survive financially, if the volume sales do not occur.
What happens when someone, who can make the decisions, pulls the plug.
Cheers
Jon
The problem with that, however, is that a SPAD should be registered as soon as the front of the train passes the signal; the signal should change to danger after the back of the train has passed the signal, and the signal behind should clear (or, at least, set to single caution) only when the back of the train is some considerable distance away from the signal (which is called an "overlap"). Moving the position of the link 0 cannot do all of these things at once.