Ooops.... Trains in Trouble

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

ralph0chadkirk
Established Forum Member
Posts: 309
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:13 pm

Re: Ooops.... Trains in Trouble

Post by ralph0chadkirk »

Whenever the formation of a train is changed in any way, a continuity test must be done.
Image
User avatar
salopiangrowler
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 7796
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Shrewsbury
Contact:

Re: Ooops.... Trains in Trouble

Post by salopiangrowler »

perhaps it was done between the video stopping and restarting. there is a bit of a jump :-?
Image
AndyUK
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 7:57 pm

Re: Ooops.... Trains in Trouble

Post by AndyUK »

ralph0chadkirk wrote:Whenever the formation of a train is changed in any way, a continuity test must be done.
Not heard of a continuity test, how does it differ from the brake test that's also been mentioned and which I understand to be the one where the train pipe is opened at the opposite end of the train from the loco?
timenec
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 8:09 am

Re: Ooops.... Trains in Trouble

Post by timenec »

Semantics;Ralph is correct.Even if the only change is to remove a vehicle from the rear of a train a further full brake test must be performed.(To ensure the brakes work on the last vehicle).The rules used to require the groundstaff to check the brakes work on the last three vehicles but today we are down to one.(Freight trains).
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”