One to be no more
Moderator: Moderators
- superdrive1
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:20 pm
- Location: Stansted Mountfitchet, Essex, UK
Re: One to be no more
The Whole Of The UK Might As Well Be East Anglia Then 
AJ - Casual lurker. Human with Aspergers. Forever 18, in my dreams...
-
TheAmateurBasher
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:52 pm
- Location: St Helens in Merseyside. Or onboard any train, anywhere, and at any time in particular!
- Contact:
Re: One to be no more
Yeah, an almost loco-haulage replacement to Virgin and Cross Country perhaps?superdrive1 wrote:The Whole Of The UK Might As Well Be East Anglia Then
David Hennessey, The Amateur Basher
Bashing trains in the North West and beyond!
http://davidhennesseystrainworld.webs.com - FOTOPIC REPLACEMENT
http://www.youtube.com/theamateurbasher
http://www.flickr.com/photos/david-hennessey
Bashing trains in the North West and beyond!
http://davidhennesseystrainworld.webs.com - FOTOPIC REPLACEMENT
http://www.youtube.com/theamateurbasher
http://www.flickr.com/photos/david-hennessey
- superdrive1
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:20 pm
- Location: Stansted Mountfitchet, Essex, UK
Re: One to be no more
Other Companys Hire And Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis, But "one" Never Buys Or Hires Any Stock In My Opinion.
AJ - Casual lurker. Human with Aspergers. Forever 18, in my dreams...
- AlistairW
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
- Location: London North Eastern
Re: One to be no more
I heard it was called 'one' because it was the first TOC to have a designated London Terminus and a combination of local and fast services. (Excluding Marylebone)n863dwt wrote:FYI... the name "ONE" means/meant.. - Operated by National Express... make any more sense?
Cheers,
Ali
- danielw2599
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1601
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: I'm behind you!
Re: One to be no more
"ONE" do lease Class 90 locos when they have a shortage of their own either due to planned maintenance or due to faults. The reason they don't generally "buy or hire" other stock is because there is no need too. I'd also like to know what other TOCS "Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis".superdrive1 wrote:Other Companys Hire And Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis, But "one" Never Buys Or Hires Any Stock In My Opinion.
On the subject of the name "ONE", it was supposed to highlight the fact that it was just "ONE" franchise that operated in East Anglia, where as previous it was both First Great Eastern and Anglia Railways.
- danielw2599
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1601
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: I'm behind you!
Re: One to be no more
I wouldn't worry, the trains are still the same (albeit different livery), the staff is still the same and the WTT is still the same, as is the franchise owener (NX).superdrive1 wrote:Goodbye To The "one" Era Then
- superdrive1
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:20 pm
- Location: Stansted Mountfitchet, Essex, UK
Re: One to be no more
Our Stock Seems To Be Pinched By Everyone Else, So "one" are left hiring other Company's Trains

Also, Refering To First Great Eastern And Anglia Railways Using Liverpool Street, There Was WAGN As Well Using Liverpool Street.danielw2599 wrote:"ONE" do lease Class 90 locos when they have a shortage of their own either due to planned maintenance or due to faults. The reason they don't generally "buy or hire" other stock is because there is no need too. I'd also like to know what other TOCS "Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis".superdrive1 wrote:Other Companys Hire And Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis, But "one" Never Buys Or Hires Any Stock In My Opinion.
On the subject of the name "ONE", it was supposed to highlight the fact that it was just "ONE" franchise that operated in East Anglia, where as previous it was both First Great Eastern and Anglia Railways.
AJ - Casual lurker. Human with Aspergers. Forever 18, in my dreams...
- danielw2599
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1601
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: I'm behind you!
Re: One to be no more
Opps, thought I missed one!superdrive1 wrote:Our Stock Seems To Be Pinched By Everyone Else, So "one" are left hiring other Company's TrainsAlso, Refering To First Great Eastern And Anglia Railways Using Liverpool Street, There Was WAGN As Well Using Liverpool Street.danielw2599 wrote:"ONE" do lease Class 90 locos when they have a shortage of their own either due to planned maintenance or due to faults. The reason they don't generally "buy or hire" other stock is because there is no need too. I'd also like to know what other TOCS "Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis".superdrive1 wrote:Other Companys Hire And Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis, But "one" Never Buys Or Hires Any Stock In My Opinion.
On the subject of the name "ONE", it was supposed to highlight the fact that it was just "ONE" franchise that operated in East Anglia, where as previous it was both First Great Eastern and Anglia Railways.
- superdrive1
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:20 pm
- Location: Stansted Mountfitchet, Essex, UK
Re: One to be no more
National Express Run Coaches And Should Only Run Coaches In My View.danielw2599 wrote:I wouldn't worry, the trains are still the same (albeit different livery), the staff is still the same and the WTT is still the same, as is the franchise owener (NX).superdrive1 wrote:Goodbye To The "one" Era Then
AJ - Casual lurker. Human with Aspergers. Forever 18, in my dreams...
- AlistairW
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
- Location: London North Eastern
Re: One to be no more
Any particular reason exactly, I think NX do a reasonable job to be honest, I'd rather them than some of the other companies playing trains. Just my view though.superdrive1 wrote:National Express Run Coaches And Should Only Run Coaches In My View.danielw2599 wrote:I wouldn't worry, the trains are still the same (albeit different livery), the staff is still the same and the WTT is still the same, as is the franchise owener (NX).superdrive1 wrote:Goodbye To The "one" Era Then
- superdrive1
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:20 pm
- Location: Stansted Mountfitchet, Essex, UK
Re: One to be no more
I Don't Think Trains Are National Express Work. 
AJ - Casual lurker. Human with Aspergers. Forever 18, in my dreams...
- MoonKid47
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 4030
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:50 pm
- Location: Trapped In A Server Room On Mars...
- Contact:
Re: One to be no more
Tell that to Stobart Railsuperdrive1 wrote:I Don't Think Trains Are National Express Work.
Alex Stankevitch
Stank-my-vitch-up
Stank-my-vitch-up
-
bgstrowger
- Been on the forums for a while
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:53 pm
- Location: Whitstable, Kent
Re: One to be no more
It's certainly shocking to think that all but two franchises are held by bus bandits. There again, it's shocking to see the amount of bus companies that aren't owned by the big five.
- arabiandisco
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
- Location: The Church of Noise
- Contact:
Re: One to be no more
It doesn't really matter, does it? Provided the rail side of the business has the right people running it, it is irrelevant what the name painted on the side is.bgstrowger wrote:It's certainly shocking to think that all but two franchises are held by bus bandits. There again, it's shocking to see the amount of bus companies that aren't owned by the big five.
If you're judging on the size of the business, then surely the likes of Fist are actually rail companies with a sideline in buses now?
What about the fact that the "other two" are now owned by nationalised rail companies from Denmark/ Germany?
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
Go 49ers
-
bgstrowger
- Been on the forums for a while
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:53 pm
- Location: Whitstable, Kent
Re: One to be no more
I suppose it's just my own concern about the increasing homogenisation of our town centres. With the ever increasing prevalence of corporate branding, it'll soon be difficult to tell what town/city you're in. Plus if we let these companies get too big, there won't be any alternatives and they will be in a position to make unreasonable demands on the local council/government.arabiandisco wrote:It doesn't really matter, does it? Provided the rail side of the business has the right people running it, it is irrelevant what the name painted on the side is.bgstrowger wrote:It's certainly shocking to think that all but two franchises are held by bus bandits. There again, it's shocking to see the amount of bus companies that aren't owned by the big five.
If you're judging on the size of the business, then surely the likes of Fist are actually rail companies with a sideline in buses now?
What about the fact that the "other two" are now owned by nationalised rail companies from Denmark/ Germany?
It'll certainly be interesting to see what Deutsche Bahn do with Chiltern and also with the Overground.