One to be no more

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
superdrive1
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1703
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:20 pm
Location: Stansted Mountfitchet, Essex, UK

Re: One to be no more

Post by superdrive1 »

The Whole Of The UK Might As Well Be East Anglia Then :lol:
AJ - Casual lurker. Human with Aspergers. Forever 18, in my dreams...
TheAmateurBasher
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2227
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:52 pm
Location: St Helens in Merseyside. Or onboard any train, anywhere, and at any time in particular!
Contact:

Re: One to be no more

Post by TheAmateurBasher »

superdrive1 wrote:The Whole Of The UK Might As Well Be East Anglia Then :lol:
Yeah, an almost loco-haulage replacement to Virgin and Cross Country perhaps? :lol: (Only kidding of course!)
David Hennessey, The Amateur Basher

Bashing trains in the North West and beyond! :-D

http://davidhennesseystrainworld.webs.com - FOTOPIC REPLACEMENT
http://www.youtube.com/theamateurbasher
http://www.flickr.com/photos/david-hennessey
User avatar
superdrive1
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1703
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:20 pm
Location: Stansted Mountfitchet, Essex, UK

Re: One to be no more

Post by superdrive1 »

Other Companys Hire And Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis, But "one" Never Buys Or Hires Any Stock In My Opinion.
AJ - Casual lurker. Human with Aspergers. Forever 18, in my dreams...
User avatar
AlistairW
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: London North Eastern

Re: One to be no more

Post by AlistairW »

n863dwt wrote:FYI... the name "ONE" means/meant.. - Operated by National Express... make any more sense?
I heard it was called 'one' because it was the first TOC to have a designated London Terminus and a combination of local and fast services. (Excluding Marylebone)

Cheers,
Ali
User avatar
danielw2599
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1601
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:00 am
Location: I'm behind you!

Re: One to be no more

Post by danielw2599 »

superdrive1 wrote:Other Companys Hire And Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis, But "one" Never Buys Or Hires Any Stock In My Opinion.
"ONE" do lease Class 90 locos when they have a shortage of their own either due to planned maintenance or due to faults. The reason they don't generally "buy or hire" other stock is because there is no need too. I'd also like to know what other TOCS "Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis".

On the subject of the name "ONE", it was supposed to highlight the fact that it was just "ONE" franchise that operated in East Anglia, where as previous it was both First Great Eastern and Anglia Railways.
User avatar
danielw2599
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1601
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:00 am
Location: I'm behind you!

Re: One to be no more

Post by danielw2599 »

superdrive1 wrote:Goodbye To The "one" Era Then :cry:
I wouldn't worry, the trains are still the same (albeit different livery), the staff is still the same and the WTT is still the same, as is the franchise owener (NX).
User avatar
superdrive1
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1703
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:20 pm
Location: Stansted Mountfitchet, Essex, UK

Re: One to be no more

Post by superdrive1 »

Our Stock Seems To Be Pinched By Everyone Else, So "one" are left hiring other Company's Trains
danielw2599 wrote:
superdrive1 wrote:Other Companys Hire And Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis, But "one" Never Buys Or Hires Any Stock In My Opinion.
"ONE" do lease Class 90 locos when they have a shortage of their own either due to planned maintenance or due to faults. The reason they don't generally "buy or hire" other stock is because there is no need too. I'd also like to know what other TOCS "Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis".

On the subject of the name "ONE", it was supposed to highlight the fact that it was just "ONE" franchise that operated in East Anglia, where as previous it was both First Great Eastern and Anglia Railways.
Also, Refering To First Great Eastern And Anglia Railways Using Liverpool Street, There Was WAGN As Well Using Liverpool Street. :roll:
AJ - Casual lurker. Human with Aspergers. Forever 18, in my dreams...
User avatar
danielw2599
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1601
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:00 am
Location: I'm behind you!

Re: One to be no more

Post by danielw2599 »

superdrive1 wrote:Our Stock Seems To Be Pinched By Everyone Else, So "one" are left hiring other Company's Trains
danielw2599 wrote:
superdrive1 wrote:Other Companys Hire And Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis, But "one" Never Buys Or Hires Any Stock In My Opinion.
"ONE" do lease Class 90 locos when they have a shortage of their own either due to planned maintenance or due to faults. The reason they don't generally "buy or hire" other stock is because there is no need too. I'd also like to know what other TOCS "Buy "one" Trains On A Constant Basis".

On the subject of the name "ONE", it was supposed to highlight the fact that it was just "ONE" franchise that operated in East Anglia, where as previous it was both First Great Eastern and Anglia Railways.
Also, Refering To First Great Eastern And Anglia Railways Using Liverpool Street, There Was WAGN As Well Using Liverpool Street. :roll:
Opps, thought I missed one!
User avatar
superdrive1
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1703
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:20 pm
Location: Stansted Mountfitchet, Essex, UK

Re: One to be no more

Post by superdrive1 »

danielw2599 wrote:
superdrive1 wrote:Goodbye To The "one" Era Then :cry:
I wouldn't worry, the trains are still the same (albeit different livery), the staff is still the same and the WTT is still the same, as is the franchise owener (NX).
National Express Run Coaches And Should Only Run Coaches In My View. :D
AJ - Casual lurker. Human with Aspergers. Forever 18, in my dreams...
User avatar
AlistairW
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: London North Eastern

Re: One to be no more

Post by AlistairW »

superdrive1 wrote:
danielw2599 wrote:
superdrive1 wrote:Goodbye To The "one" Era Then :cry:
I wouldn't worry, the trains are still the same (albeit different livery), the staff is still the same and the WTT is still the same, as is the franchise owener (NX).
National Express Run Coaches And Should Only Run Coaches In My View. :D
Any particular reason exactly, I think NX do a reasonable job to be honest, I'd rather them than some of the other companies playing trains. Just my view though. :)
User avatar
superdrive1
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1703
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:20 pm
Location: Stansted Mountfitchet, Essex, UK

Re: One to be no more

Post by superdrive1 »

I Don't Think Trains Are National Express Work. :D
AJ - Casual lurker. Human with Aspergers. Forever 18, in my dreams...
User avatar
MoonKid47
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4030
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:50 pm
Location: Trapped In A Server Room On Mars...
Contact:

Re: One to be no more

Post by MoonKid47 »

superdrive1 wrote:I Don't Think Trains Are National Express Work. :D
Tell that to Stobart Rail :P
Alex Stankevitch
Stank-my-vitch-up
bgstrowger
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:53 pm
Location: Whitstable, Kent

Re: One to be no more

Post by bgstrowger »

It's certainly shocking to think that all but two franchises are held by bus bandits. There again, it's shocking to see the amount of bus companies that aren't owned by the big five.
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Re: One to be no more

Post by arabiandisco »

bgstrowger wrote:It's certainly shocking to think that all but two franchises are held by bus bandits. There again, it's shocking to see the amount of bus companies that aren't owned by the big five.
It doesn't really matter, does it? Provided the rail side of the business has the right people running it, it is irrelevant what the name painted on the side is.

If you're judging on the size of the business, then surely the likes of Fist are actually rail companies with a sideline in buses now?

What about the fact that the "other two" are now owned by nationalised rail companies from Denmark/ Germany?
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
bgstrowger
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:53 pm
Location: Whitstable, Kent

Re: One to be no more

Post by bgstrowger »

arabiandisco wrote:
bgstrowger wrote:It's certainly shocking to think that all but two franchises are held by bus bandits. There again, it's shocking to see the amount of bus companies that aren't owned by the big five.
It doesn't really matter, does it? Provided the rail side of the business has the right people running it, it is irrelevant what the name painted on the side is.

If you're judging on the size of the business, then surely the likes of Fist are actually rail companies with a sideline in buses now?

What about the fact that the "other two" are now owned by nationalised rail companies from Denmark/ Germany?
I suppose it's just my own concern about the increasing homogenisation of our town centres. With the ever increasing prevalence of corporate branding, it'll soon be difficult to tell what town/city you're in. Plus if we let these companies get too big, there won't be any alternatives and they will be in a position to make unreasonable demands on the local council/government.

It'll certainly be interesting to see what Deutsche Bahn do with Chiltern and also with the Overground.
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”