FGW threatens to sue London TravelWatch

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar

ashgray
Wafflus Maximus
Posts: 12235
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: GWR, Nailsea, Somerset

Post by ashgray »

Orinoco999 - you have a PM.

Ashley
Ashley Gray

Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.2Ghz Quad Core, Gigabyte Gaming Motherboard, 2 x 512Gb SSDs + 1TB SATA drives,
16 Gb DDR-4 Corsair RAM, Nvidia GeForce GTX1060 6Gb RAM, ASUS Xonar D2X/XDT Soundcard, Windows 10 64 bit
User avatar
bdy26
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3854
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 8:34 pm
Location: Manchester, rain.

Post by bdy26 »

"Slaughter & May wrote again, saying: “Your continued failure to address and remedy the damage being caused by your defamatory remarks is plainly unacceptable . . . Our client feels compelled to reserve its position against you.”

That actually isn't threatening to sue anyone... just legal talk I see every day. From a publicity standpoint, FGW would be unwise to sue a watchdog body, it would only draw more attention to performance, which can be objectively measured!
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”