Unidentified NSE 4-car DMU

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
User avatar
hertford
Established Forum Member
Posts: 452
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:09 am
Location: Sidney, British Columbia, Canada
Contact:

Unidentified NSE 4-car DMU

Post by hertford »

I've just looked at a certain video on Youtube, at Wembly Park tube station on the Metropolitan line, when at about 36 seconds through the video an unidentified Network South East 4 car DMU flies past on the Marylebone lines! What could the class of this train be? Since I'm very interested in such matters like this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KU0jkwCVmg&NR=1

Hertford.
User avatar
alexnick
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1827
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:12 pm
Location: 70C

Post by alexnick »

Looks like a 117 to me - unless anyone else has any more accurate suggestions. I'm pretty sure that they worked out of Marlybone (if I remember the NSE handbook correctly).

Nick
User avatar
allypally
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6519
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 2:28 pm
Location: West Midlands

Post by allypally »

It'll be a Marylebone 115.
Alex
Honorary Citizen of the Independent Peanut Republic of Rushey Platt
User avatar
Hymek
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2270
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2002 12:00 am
Location: 38A/85D
Contact:

Post by Hymek »

Yes, it will be a 115, as 117s were only three car DMUs. Also the cab shape, headcode box and suburban style doors rule out

101,104,116,118s and 119s
http://www.svr-dmu.org.uk - DMU Group WM
http://www.englishelectricpreservation.co.uk/ - English Electric Preservation

Producer of Rolling Stock for the UKTS community Since September 2002
User avatar
hertford
Established Forum Member
Posts: 452
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:09 am
Location: Sidney, British Columbia, Canada
Contact:

Post by hertford »

Thanks guys, I thought it was similar to a 117, but I didn't even think of a 115, simply because the only 115 on UKTS is a WSR livery...

Cheers
Hertford
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

Is there any real difference between a 117 and a 115? Externally, I can't see any significant differences. Different engines perhaps?
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
User avatar
allypally
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6519
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 2:28 pm
Location: West Midlands

Post by allypally »

115s were built by BR Derby in 1960, they use 2 230hp BUT engines per vehicle, 117s were built by Pressed Steel in 1959-1960, using 2 150hp BUT engines per vehicle. 117s are also 3 car units, 115 are 4.
Alex
Honorary Citizen of the Independent Peanut Republic of Rushey Platt
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

I suppose the different engines are because 115s have an extra trailer vehicle. Back then they didn't fit non-driving cars with engines.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
chriscooper
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 12:00 am

Post by chriscooper »

IIRC, the 115s also had smaller luggage space in the guards compartment than the 117s, but had one in each DM rarther than just at one end. Also, the 115s were ungangwayed. They were very similar to the Class 127 Bed-Pan units, also built at Derby as 4 coach units, but they had 238hp Rolls Royce engines and hydralic transmission, rarther than the BUT Leyland (although badged Albion) engines. The 230hp Leylands were also fitted to the 123 and 124 Intercity units.
User avatar
tigermon
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 736
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 5:23 am

Post by tigermon »

arabiandisco wrote:I suppose the different engines are because 115s have an extra trailer vehicle. Back then they didn't fit non-driving cars with engines.
Does the Class 124 not count then?
chriscooper
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 12:00 am

Post by chriscooper »

The 124 was a bit of an exception, not only being 6 coaches, but also being designed for the Trans Pennine route with all it's steep gradients, hence the need for more power. The 185 is a modern replacement, although loco haulage and 158s have been used in between.
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”