Virgin Voyagers, terrible.

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
allypally
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6519
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 2:28 pm
Location: West Midlands

Post by allypally »

Yeah, that said, there's nothing you can do about that - if one of the traincrew is sufficiently ill that they feel they can't take the train further they must be relieved as soon as possible.
Alex
Honorary Citizen of the Independent Peanut Republic of Rushey Platt
User avatar
baggy6233
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1528
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Here, there and everywhere
Contact:

Post by baggy6233 »

There were 2 (yes, 2!) failed Voyagers at Oxford at the same time yesterday.
One had failed just south of Oxford station and the Oxfordshire Express was routed wrong line around the Voyager and there was also ANOTHER Voyager failed in the station because the doors wouldn't open! :-?
User avatar
NiallGray
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4282
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 1:55 am

Post by NiallGray »

jamesinbolton wrote:Don't worry you won't get an argument.

Permission is being obtained to run at 135 through the trent valley.

http://www.virgintrainsmediaroom.com/in ... icleid=870

Something about it here. I am not sure at which stage approval will be (if at all)given.

I am not sure who decides where the cut-off point is in relation to in-cab signalling. I was under the impression that the cut-off was at 125mph unless an extra aspect could be added to an existing 4-colour light signal to increase it to 5 aspects; which I assume is the reason for seeking permission to have it increased to 135, maybe to take into account the braking capabilities of more modern rolling stock.

Looking at that site, it says Virgin trains are planning to increase the capacity on the lines and run even more services (ie every 20 minutes between Manchester and London).
They'll need more stock presumably, so does that mean more Pendos on order?
The Class 303/311 pack - 26 EMUs for MSTS/OR covering every era of these iconic Clyde-based units. From Caley Blue to Carmine and Cream!
Available now on UKTS - File 34622
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

NiallGray wrote:
jamesinbolton wrote:Don't worry you won't get an argument.

Permission is being obtained to run at 135 through the trent valley.

http://www.virgintrainsmediaroom.com/in ... icleid=870

Something about it here. I am not sure at which stage approval will be (if at all)given.

I am not sure who decides where the cut-off point is in relation to in-cab signalling. I was under the impression that the cut-off was at 125mph unless an extra aspect could be added to an existing 4-colour light signal to increase it to 5 aspects; which I assume is the reason for seeking permission to have it increased to 135, maybe to take into account the braking capabilities of more modern rolling stock.

Looking at that site, it says Virgin trains are planning to increase the capacity on the lines and run even more services (ie every 20 minutes between Manchester and London).
They'll need more stock presumably, so does that mean more Pendos on order?
No new stock, they'll need greater availability from what they have now, and shorter turn-rounds. I think they only need 47 of 53 at the moment, which will increase to about 50 when they increase the frequency.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”