Atomic Systems

Allways make me

Class 158 New Hum



Didnt know passengers knew so much about trains

from Birmingham Evening Mail Friday 02/02/07

MARTIN

I'd take the class 170s - the doors are easily as wide as the 150s. People don't seem to like sitting in the middle 3+2 seat anyway. 170s also deputise on Brum to Walsall locals every so often anyway.

With no prospect of Cannock line electrification, Class 170s are better suited than many others to that line, particularly as they are normally non-stop between New St and Walsall. There are issues with using 170s on the Snow Hill lines - I don't think Snow Hill traincrew sign 170s (certainly they never have done in the past).

yes, but from a reliable source, the central 170s have shocking reliability and have the time are OOA anyway

at least with the 150s they work if you hit it with a hammer hard enough

Hymek wrote:yes, but from a reliable source, the central 170s have shocking reliability and have the time are OOA anyway

at least with the 150s they work if you hit it with a hammer hard enough

As I was told once by a fitter at Newton Heath.

If they fitter's hammer won't get it moving again they don't give up, they just go and get a bigger hammer...

There was a 158 at Eastleigh last night.

(Was Central Green, with First PE logo stuck on)

We suggested a bigger hamer to fix it. He did not look too impressed.

jamesinbolton wrote:

Hymek wrote:yes, but from a reliable source, the central 170s have shocking reliability and have the time are OOA anyway

at least with the 150s they work if you hit it with a hammer hard enough

As I was told once by a fitter at Newton Heath.

If they fitter's hammer won't get it moving again they don't give up, they just go and get a bigger hammer...

Same with the Electrostars, something with the EGRESS and a good kick.

Hi
Has Central trains lost its complete francise...or is it just parts of it?...and when do they go?
Could it be, they are asset stripping?
Cheers
Jon

jbilton wrote:Hi
Has Central trains lost its complete francise...or is it just parts of it?...and when do they go?
Could it be, they are asset stripping?
Cheers
Jon

Have a read of this John

http://www.rmtbristol.org.uk/2005/10/lo ... eakup.html

More DMU's running under the wires thats all we need, i cant do much about Birmingham Cannock service do hope the EMU's still run to Walsall

MARTIN

from reading that, it sounds like the DfT are going to . the whole west midlands area up.

Seems they are doing stupid things like axing two cross city trains an hour which could be pretty darned stupid cos it can get rather busy

I thought anyone would be delighted to get rid of 150s, still IMO, the least comfortable train to travel on ever designed....

And there was me thinking the 1st generation DMUs were on their way back!

Could be worse, you could have people using the "the older trains are not safe" line on you as an absolute and final point to justify having bad new replacement stock fostered upon you. </grumble>

Hymek you make your comment as though you were somewhat suprised at the DfT being stupid?

alisterbetts wrote:I thought anyone would be delighted to get rid of 150s, still IMO, the least comfortable train to travel on ever designed....

Pacers surely get that prize?

David

Hymek wrote:from reading that, it sounds like the DfT are going to . the whole west midlands area up.

Seems they are doing stupid things like axing two cross city trains an hour which could be pretty darned stupid cos it can get rather busy

Only in the peaks though - I've travelled on it during the day both on weekdays and weekends and the trains have carried fewer than 10 passengers.