Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 7:51 pm
If it is planned and marketed well, then CTRL-DS could increase capacity for inner-suburban passengers. If the CTRL becomes route of choice for many east Kent passengers, then for starters 'classic line' services originating from east Kent could be less heavily loaded - more seats for west Kent and south-east London passengers. The Medway CTRL services, if these take off, could also allow for fast services to be removed west of the Medway - more track capacity for inner-suburban services. Then there is the growth potential - CTRL, with all that spare capacity, has a lot more potential than the existing lines - if the housing growth is concentrated in east Kent, with CTRL as mode-of-choice, then this mitigates against some of the congestion issues if that housing were to be further in toward London.
Ebbsfleet International is one place which could make or break CTRL-DS' long-term future. Without CTRL-DS, Ebbsfleet will be a British 'Haute-Picardie' - with it, that area's potential is huge.
The specification does seem a bit on the slow side - 75mph on 3rd Rail is not good, perhaps time for (yet another) Southern PSU?! I would also be minded to suggest that some off-peak DS should use the Fawkham-Southfleet Interconnexion, running into Victoria, thereby retaining a direct off-peak link with the West End, and ensuring all parts of CTRL are used.
Ebbsfleet International is one place which could make or break CTRL-DS' long-term future. Without CTRL-DS, Ebbsfleet will be a British 'Haute-Picardie' - with it, that area's potential is huge.
The specification does seem a bit on the slow side - 75mph on 3rd Rail is not good, perhaps time for (yet another) Southern PSU?! I would also be minded to suggest that some off-peak DS should use the Fawkham-Southfleet Interconnexion, running into Victoria, thereby retaining a direct off-peak link with the West End, and ensuring all parts of CTRL are used.