Grange, Hall Castle, King what class is the best

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

Grange, Hall, Castle, King

Grange
3
7%
Hall
4
9%
Castle
2
4%
King
3
7%
All
8
18%
Grange and Hall
0
No votes
Grange and Castle
2
4%
Grange and King
0
No votes
Hall and Castle
0
No votes
Hall and King
1
2%
Castle and King
4
9%
none
18
40%
 
Total votes: 45

User avatar
MuzTrem
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2406
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Bucks UK
Contact:

Post by MuzTrem »

JonPotter wrote:Even when they were in fine form back in the days of steam they were the 3rd best LNER pacifics - after, of course, the A4's and A2/2's
Not surprising, considering they were the first of the LNER pacifics, indeed the first successful pacifics in Britain (the Great Bear was a waste of time :wink: ) it was inevitable that the LNER produced better engines after them. After all, the LNER was company that moved with the times, unlike some others I could mention :wink:
JonPotter wrote:how many SR's do you have now?
The total of my rail mags currently stands at 815, but they're not all SR's obviously! My SRs range from issue 3 to current but there are a lot of gaps.
Image
User avatar
JonPotter
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2357
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:25 pm
Location: Bucks, England
Contact:

Post by JonPotter »

MuzTrem wrote:After all, the LNER was company that moved with the times, unlike some others I could mention :wink:
ooooooooooooooooh....... :( :lol:
User avatar
DeanGoods
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 4:31 pm
Location: Not to sure at the moment......

Post by DeanGoods »

MuzTrem wrote:After all, the LNER was company that moved with the times, unlike some others I could mention :wink:
[
such as :D
Member of Spa Valley Railway
http://www.spavalleyrailway.co.uk/
Image
User avatar
MuzTrem
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2406
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Bucks UK
Contact:

Post by MuzTrem »

Considering Jon's a GWR fan, guess :wink:
Image
User avatar
JonPotter
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2357
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:25 pm
Location: Bucks, England
Contact:

Post by JonPotter »

Me - a GWR fan.............!
User avatar
jimmyladd
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3107
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:26 pm
Contact:

Post by jimmyladd »

hee hee! the pole is a bit of an eye opener! :)
Working to restore D8233, D5705 and D9531
User avatar
DeanGoods
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 4:31 pm
Location: Not to sure at the moment......

Post by DeanGoods »

IM THE GWR MAN :D
Member of Spa Valley Railway
http://www.spavalleyrailway.co.uk/
Image
User avatar
davidaward
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Post by davidaward »

A Manor is more fun to work with that any of those!

Great sound, nice neat outline and an absolute doddle to fire (in real life anyway!)!
Image
User avatar
salopiangrowler
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 7796
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Shrewsbury
Contact:

Post by salopiangrowler »

Best Mixed traffic engine:
The 'Grange' class, my father always said to me that if you see a grange on a freight you knew the freight was gonna be a mile long, and then if a grange was summoned to a passeger job you coulde garuntee top class performance and an early arrival at every station.

Best Non mixed Traffic Engine (Passenger)
Kings, Without a doubt 100mph + even before scotsman did it.

Best Non Mixed Traffic Engine (Freight)
Collets 2 - 8 - 0t mainstay of the south wales coal fields excellent service history.

Deans goods comes in close as a good reliable engine also

Best Branchline Engine (passenger)
Small prarie's cute lil things good on both passenger and freight.

Best branchline engine (Freight)
Panier\saddle tank o - 6 - 0 small quick reliable and britians most loved little engines, if it werent for these thomas would look lost amongst gordan james and henry.
Image
User avatar
johncard
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 9:42 am
Location: Sheffield

Post by johncard »

MuzTrem wrote:After all, the LNER was company that moved with the times, unlike some others I could mention :wink:
Give 'em a break MuzTrem - no other railway could match that quaint Victorian feel - perfect for a tourist line and not much else :wink:

John
Cheers
John
User avatar
salopiangrowler
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 7796
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Shrewsbury
Contact:

Post by salopiangrowler »

i do believe this poll is about gwr loco's and not companies
Image
User avatar
DeanGoods
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 4:31 pm
Location: Not to sure at the moment......

Post by DeanGoods »

what he said :D
Member of Spa Valley Railway
http://www.spavalleyrailway.co.uk/
Image
User avatar
MuzTrem
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2406
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Bucks UK
Contact:

Post by MuzTrem »

salopiangrowler wrote:Kings, Without a doubt 100mph + even before scotsman did it
Flying Scotsman was the first 100mph loco. The dynamometer car proved it. End of story.
Now name me one King that has run London-Edinbourgh non-stop....
Image
User avatar
davidaward
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Post by davidaward »

MuzTrem wrote:
salopiangrowler wrote:Kings, Without a doubt 100mph + even before scotsman did it
Flying Scotsman was the first 100mph loco. The dynamometer car proved it. End of story.
Now name me one King that has run London-Edinbourgh non-stop....
No it wasn't.................

A lanky Highflier did it first!

Big Wow, non stop London to Edinburgh- a Midland Compound did that one before the Scotsman was inaugurated!

And to the GWR's defence they were sensible (like the LMS except for a notable publicity stunt) they said there was no need for non stop as such trains would not have been economically viable on their systems!- why bypass Bristol, Exeter and Plymouth to go non-stop to penzance!
Image
User avatar
salopiangrowler
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 7796
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Shrewsbury
Contact:

Post by salopiangrowler »

MuzTrem wrote:
salopiangrowler wrote:Kings, Without a doubt 100mph + even before scotsman did it
Flying Scotsman was the first 100mph loco. The dynamometer car proved it. End of story.
Now name me one King that has run London-Edinbourgh non-stop....
Cheltenham Flyer was born before the Flying Scotsman express and the cheltenham flyer was were truro broke the record a few years before scotsman did. i bet you a king or castle have done it during the swap me your loco trails.
Image
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”