re-streamlining Duchess of Hamilton.

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

Should Duchess of Hamilton be re-streamlined?

YES!!!
26
74%
NO!!!
5
14%
Have a mock up next to the loco.
4
11%
 
Total votes: 35

Frellis
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 8:30 pm
Location: England. Rule Britania, Marmalade and Jam 5 chinese crackers up ur ***hole BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG!

re-streamlining Duchess of Hamilton.

Post by Frellis »

Personally, I dont like the idea. :(
The Duchess is my favourite loco and seeing as how Duchess of Sutherland always seems to be in LMS marroon I think it would be better if Hamilton was left as it is and a mock up of the streamlined loco put next to it.
However if it does go ahead and they put her into main line working in that guise I think that they should go the full monty and paint it's train in the streamlined livery. If your gonna do something at least do it right, eh? :)



Cheers
FRED
If a man stands talking in a field and there isn't a woman around for miles.......is he still wrong?
Frellis
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 8:30 pm
Location: England. Rule Britania, Marmalade and Jam 5 chinese crackers up ur ***hole BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG!

Post by Frellis »

i cant believe it I accidentally clicked the yes button!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What a plonker!!!! :lol:
I meant no. Honestly
If a man stands talking in a field and there isn't a woman around for miles.......is he still wrong?
User avatar
Christopher125
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2629
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Sandown, Isle of Wight (hooray!)

Post by Christopher125 »

Hi

What do you mean by 'its always in LMS maroon', It will be when the streamlining is put on. Also, its only really a mock up, and the engine needs an overhaul anyway so it isn't going anywhere. Which brings me on to my next question, it hasn't got 'its own train', so it would be a bit hard to repaint! :) Are you sure you're not getting confused with Duchess of Sutherland?

Personally, I think its good that one duchess should be non-streamlined, with the other streamlined, because then people can compare them. Also, it will look good when it is sitting next to Mallard.

Chris 8)
Image
User avatar
LNERandBR
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1256
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:06 pm
Location: Nere Skegness, Licolnshire. The air is SO Bracing.
Contact:

Post by LNERandBR »

I think that they should get Duchess of Hamilton re-streamlined.
Then they should get both Mallard and Duchess of Hamilton on the Mainline and compare them.
By Stephen.
Mad about BR Eastern Region in the 50's, BR Rail Blue and the BR Sectors.
Visit the Boston MRS website
User avatar
davidaward
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Post by davidaward »

I have never seen a streamlined Duchess (obviously) and would like to do so, having read all the articles etc about 'how much better the LNER streamlining was', I would like to make up my mind first hand!
Image
User avatar
LNERandBR
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1256
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:06 pm
Location: Nere Skegness, Licolnshire. The air is SO Bracing.
Contact:

Post by LNERandBR »

they should have wind tunnel tests to see whose streamlineing was most effective.

Somehow I think that the LNER's steamlineing will be better :)
(but then I'm biest towards the LNER :lol: )
By Stephen.
Mad about BR Eastern Region in the 50's, BR Rail Blue and the BR Sectors.
Visit the Boston MRS website
User avatar
davidaward
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Post by davidaward »

LNERandBR wrote:they should have wind tunnel tests to see whose streamlineing was most effective.

Somehow I think that the LNER's steamlineing will be better :)
(but then I'm biest towards the LNER :lol: )
And i'm biassed the other way :wink:

Mind you anything beats the 'bullet smokebox' attempt of the GWR on streamlining! :D :D :D
Image
User avatar
LNERandBR
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1256
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:06 pm
Location: Nere Skegness, Licolnshire. The air is SO Bracing.
Contact:

Post by LNERandBR »

davidaward wrote:Mind you anything beats the 'bullet smokebox' attempt of the GWR on streamlining! :D :D :D
:-?

Never heard of it can u enlighten me
Last edited by LNERandBR on Thu Jan 27, 2005 2:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.
By Stephen.
Mad about BR Eastern Region in the 50's, BR Rail Blue and the BR Sectors.
Visit the Boston MRS website
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

I expect the bullet nose GWR steamlining was more effective than Mr Bullied's "air-smoothed" casing. Vastly uglier, though.

If you want a streamlined kettle, then an A4 is the answer, IMO.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
User avatar
LNERandBR
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1256
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:06 pm
Location: Nere Skegness, Licolnshire. The air is SO Bracing.
Contact:

Post by LNERandBR »

arabiandisco wrote:I expect the bullet nose GWR steamlining was more effective than Mr Bullied's "air-smoothed" casing. Vastly uglier, though.
Bullied's air-smoothed caceing wasent streamlineing as it was designed to allow the locos to pass though mecanised washing plants.
By Stephen.
Mad about BR Eastern Region in the 50's, BR Rail Blue and the BR Sectors.
Visit the Boston MRS website
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

but it didn't work for that either! And it made fitters lives harder. All in all, it wasn't a fabulous innovation. Though the most attractive kettle there is is a spamcan IMO.

The GWR streamlining was basically a hemisphere on the smokebox, and plasticine smeared into places where turbulence would occur - behind the chimney/ safety valve cover, and enclocinsg the valve gear. Cab fronts were also angled, and individual splashers were replaced with one long one - as seen on the "county" class. I believe the CME (whoever it was) designed the streamlining by smearing plasticine onto a model... It was applied to one Castle class and one King, though I don't know which ones.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
User avatar
LNERandBR
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1256
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:06 pm
Location: Nere Skegness, Licolnshire. The air is SO Bracing.
Contact:

Post by LNERandBR »

arabiandisco wrote:kettle
Why do you call Steam locomotives kettles. There much more than a kettle on wheels with a steam loco you carnt just push a putton pull a little leaver and go. You need to raize steam, set the cut off and lodes of things before you can move.
By Stephen.
Mad about BR Eastern Region in the 50's, BR Rail Blue and the BR Sectors.
Visit the Boston MRS website
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

the same reason I call unrebuilt Bullieds "spamcans" and class 45s "peaks".

Kettles are complicated things to drive (even more complicated if you're the fireman, IMO), but a widely used nickname for a steam locomotive is Kettle.

Anyway, as we diesel preservationists say, anyone can boil a kettle, but it takes an engineer to control explosions. And of course, when the kettle boys are cleaning out the ash and rubbish, you press the stop button in a diesel and you're in the pub 15 minutes later... :)
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
User avatar
petermakosch
The Midland Mainline Man
Posts: 3852
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:37 pm
Location: Pleasantville, UK
Contact:

Post by petermakosch »

Frellis wrote:i cant believe it I accidentally clicked the yes button!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What a plonker!!!! :lol:
I meant no. Honestly
Hahaha!!

is there a photo of the train somewhere, and then one of what they're thinking of doing to it?
i want to be uploaded
User avatar
eddief
Wafflus Maximus
Posts: 3672
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Birmingham
Contact:

Post by eddief »

I said yes because in all honesty Hamilton has no chance of getting back on the main line as it stands. It will need a vast some of money spent on it (£250,000 at least) and the NRM will not be able to get that sort of money when Sutherland is already out there (the lottery paid for Sutherlands restoration so they won't pay for Hamilton) and most enthusiasts won't pay for Hamilton for the same reason. Therefore Hamilton's only chance to run again is with the streamlined casing for 10 years at least (due to its unique status it could get enough workings to pay for another overhaul, plus it would give the NRM a new smokebox so they could run her in he recently de-streamlined format).
Chairman of Sir Edward Farms Construction/Train Co. relaunched 16th March 2004. Beta testing group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Loco_Works/
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”