Everyone else - Junk the jetliners guys. Fly something with real character. Autopilots are for cissies
Bored and no one has posted in here for a bit...
Moderator: Moderators
- Speedbird083
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:04 pm
- Location: The North East - not quite as bad as you might think.
- Contact:
- CaldRail
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1791
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Secret Route Builders Castle ( Lakeside Lodge )
Wouldn't a Vulcan bomber be better suited for that purpose?
I still say junk the jetliners. Boring boring boring dull dull oh god not another atlantic crossing and not one stewardess under 50 years old....
Forget the autopilot and fly the darn thing. Its more fun. I just can't see the point of sitting with cups of coffee for eight hours and thinking you've acheived something. Traditional skills are always the last call any pilot can make. I once flew a Cessna 150 from Thruxton and had an airspeed indicator fail in flight. Think about that. There was no ATC or autopilot to get me down. Just me and you Charlie Delta.
There was of course a happy ending. Pilot, plane, & passenger all down in one piece. It doesn't sound serious, but what are the consequences if you don't know how fast your're flying? Too slow and theres a smoking hole short of the runway. Too fast and you use the arrestor trees at the other end.
Practise the skills. Could save your life and someone elses one day.
I still say junk the jetliners. Boring boring boring dull dull oh god not another atlantic crossing and not one stewardess under 50 years old....
Forget the autopilot and fly the darn thing. Its more fun. I just can't see the point of sitting with cups of coffee for eight hours and thinking you've acheived something. Traditional skills are always the last call any pilot can make. I once flew a Cessna 150 from Thruxton and had an airspeed indicator fail in flight. Think about that. There was no ATC or autopilot to get me down. Just me and you Charlie Delta.
There was of course a happy ending. Pilot, plane, & passenger all down in one piece. It doesn't sound serious, but what are the consequences if you don't know how fast your're flying? Too slow and theres a smoking hole short of the runway. Too fast and you use the arrestor trees at the other end.
Practise the skills. Could save your life and someone elses one day.
- Speedbird083
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:04 pm
- Location: The North East - not quite as bad as you might think.
- Contact:
- TGVDuplex
- Been on the forums for a while
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:38 pm
- Location: East Coast of Canada
- Contact:
I love to get into all the procedures of the large Airbus on approach, and landing. My fav, however, is the ATR72 from Flight1. It's a turbo prop, so it has an AP, but not everything is controlled by it. I always handfly the approach and landing, just to make sure that my skills are still as good as always! :0
Cheers,
Matt
-------
R.I.P Holly - 1995-2005
-------

Add me to your MSN!
Matt
-------
R.I.P Holly - 1995-2005
-------

Add me to your MSN!
I used to manually fly but now pretty much fly on ILS all the time. I find the latter much more fun - it is a game after all - and given I tend to fly British Classic aircraft believe me you have to have your wits about you trying to get a Trident airborne or to land without stalling - more than once I've fogotten myself and retracted the slats below 225kts, and stalled it as happened in real life in Staines in 1972. Also, trying to partly manually fly the Vickers Viking whilst attempting an ILS approach using the very basic and primative autopilot is great fun - the autopilot on the Viking is a basic hold your current position thing, so you have to do the changes in direction and height manually. Again, pretty much as it would have been for the last few flying in the 1960's as airports introduced controlled approaches.
In any case, it's a game, so if people prefer to sit back on autopilot in a Scarebus or Boring 7-yawn-7, then that's their prerogative. I do sometimes, hence my repaint of the 735. It's quite fun to swap and change from a Boston-Dublin A330 to piloting a 1-11 from Dublin to Norwich. or a Viking from Dublin to Blackpool.
In any case, it's a game, so if people prefer to sit back on autopilot in a Scarebus or Boring 7-yawn-7, then that's their prerogative. I do sometimes, hence my repaint of the 735. It's quite fun to swap and change from a Boston-Dublin A330 to piloting a 1-11 from Dublin to Norwich. or a Viking from Dublin to Blackpool.
- CaldRail
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1791
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Secret Route Builders Castle ( Lakeside Lodge )
Procedures are part of flying these days, its unavoidable. I think it goes a bit over top sometimes though even allowing for safety. You're quite right, flight planning is very important, and knowing exactly how much fuel you have is absolutely vital even on a simple pleasure flight. Once you run out your options begin to vanish. And the CAA take a dim view of any pilot who runs out of fuel - as you will likely face a magistrate for doing so.Speedbird083 wrote:I think some of us find the adherence to procedures, accurate flight and fuel planning, weights etc. quite appealing.CaldRail wrote:Forget the autopilot and fly the darn thing. Its more fun.
You understand we're not talking default GPS or that awful MS flight planner, yes?
I agree about that MS GPS. AAAAARRGH! Its worse than using a real one. Please, Microsoft, put the option to access the facilities database back on the menu. Please. Pretty please. With bells on. And sugar on top.
And you still haven't sorted out stalls and spins I notice....
- Speedbird083
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:04 pm
- Location: The North East - not quite as bad as you might think.
- Contact:





