Atomic Systems

Posted: **Sat Sep 11, 2004 9:37 pm**

I have to disagree there. London Control is spot on when it comes to the various displays.

Having worked with ATC (although not a controller) it feels right as well and the control is vis drop down menus which is better than ATC Simulator which was via speech and I never did get that to work correctly.

On the full version of London control you get a manual thats 140 pages long as well as a manual explaining each sector thats over 300 pages long.

When I compared the sector manual to "real life" it was spot on regarding how it works and the entry and exit details.

Have a look at the forum (http://www.londoncontrol.com), theres also screen shots there.

Rgds Ron

Posted: **Mon Sep 13, 2004 4:34 pm**

I agree, I'm a pilot for BA, and have been based in LGW, LHR, BHX and MAN. All the procedures are spot on, and its very odd controlling a flight i've flown.

Posted: **Mon Sep 13, 2004 5:23 pm**

matthews wrote:I agree, I'm a pilot for BA, and have been based in LGW, LHR, BHX and MAN. All the procedures are spot on, and its very odd controlling a flight i've flown.

*jealous*

Airbus or Boeing?

Posted: **Mon Sep 13, 2004 5:26 pm**

747, Sorry! Used to fly the ATR then the Avro RJ

Posted: **Mon Sep 13, 2004 5:33 pm**

Ah. Must be LHR based now then

Posted: **Mon Sep 13, 2004 7:30 pm**

Airbus or Boeing

note he was based at BHX once, we only get . RJ's and a few EMB145s, the A319s went a few years back.

Atomic Systems

Air Traffic Control