Atomic Systems

Alex, small question please. I havnt yet installed this as Ive been keeping watch over comments, now want to, but just at moment I dont have enough space anywhere for Back Up Do any of the "to be installed" files in your Rar overwrite any existing files ? I dont have AP TE pack yet. Cheers & Thanks...

I've created a Bakerloo Line scenario - a quiet early morning run from Queen's Park to Elephant and back. The problem I have is that on the return trip there are yellow and red signals intermittently all the way back the line. I can't 'tab' but that's ok as I'm able to pass them without any emergen...

Alex55 wrote:

catsrcool wrote:Hi Alex.
There is a piece of OHLE missing after Pfm 3 NB at BInt. Its just after the points on tile-000110+000097 Lat 52.45226 Long -1.72679

Found it. thanks for that
There's also a "short" section end of P4 NB

Sorry, South Bound (I think I'm loosing it )

catsrcool wrote:Hi Alex.
There is a piece of OHLE missing after Pfm 3 NB at BInt. Its just after the points on tile-000110+000097 Lat 52.45226 Long -1.72679

Found it. thanks for that
There's also a "short" section end of P4 NB

The shunt neck at Watford Jctn isn't electrified according to my scenario editor, my 319 won't route there? tried a modded version of my "off to the abbey" scenario. Just had a look. Watford Yard Neck, which is used for reversing to either Watford Yard Siding 3 or 4 are all electrified. The non ele...

gptech wrote:It doesn't matter where the tree, or any other spurious scenery object, is from---just drop in to the editor, select it and press the "Delete" key on your keyboard.

Yes. But I for one, am just a little curious to find out the reason why some have it, and some don't.

bongoboy wrote:Hi Andy,
Whilst you're editing spelling mistakes - Ashton Down Nuetral Section? (as far as I can tell it's spelled correctly at all the other neutral sections )

Thanks, all done .
This meant I had to edit half my QD's as well

Can't explain it, just flown the route from Apsley down to Watford tunnels and no bushes on any lines. I am using AP track enhancement and also have v4 installed but I do own the HH route. Could that be it? The v4 route shouldn't affect v5 an any way. My only thought was that if the tree uses a tex...

I'll start with the caveat of saying of only got to use very little of the route and what little I've seen is visually and performance wise very impressive. Is there any scope for gradient changes around the London end, because one thing that sticks out as remnant from v4 is the slow line gradient ...

Well I am confused now! What version is there other than the UKTS download version? I downloaded UKTS 38218 and followed the installation instructions. I already had the previous version of the route (version 4) plus photons assets installed if that is of any relevance....... Peter There were one o...

rleirik wrote:No tree for me. Whilst we are on a spelling bee the wharf near Watford Gap is missing the h in wharf (takes off anorak...)
Robin

If you'd lent me your anorak, I've have got it right first time

There's definitely no tree there on my UKTS version. I do have some floating grass at the south end of Watford tunnel though Thanks for that. The "floating grass" is down to the ground texture used where the tunnel decal has been placed (only shows up if you have procedural flora ticked) I've re te...

Andy No I’ve not been in the editor. Having regard to earlier comments I did notice that I had ‘Procedural Flora’ turned on – which I didn’t think I had. I did however check Kensal Green again by unticking it and the tree is definitely there – it really is time Network Rail got to grips with rampan...

Just taken another quick drive - the run in to Euston from Watford is superb. Here is a screenshot showing the tree blocking the up fast on entering Kensal Green Tunnel. Very minor point but I also note that on the HUD (haven't actually checked the station sign!) Berkhamsted is not spelt correctly....

Something similar to the way you helped me with the original No Snow patch for the v4 route, Didn't we add snow to a track type rather than remove snow from something? But anyway, the procedure would basically be the same; instead of the RouteProperties.xml pointing to the default textures .bin it ...