Atomic Systems

I notice the German set now includes some semaphore style signals - ideal for doing branch lines or indeed even some main lines. However can I add my voice to the appeals for some clear end-user non-technical documentation as to what each type does and how the signals should be placed in a route, a...

and the dynamic brakes don't respond too on br143

I've tested the scenario editing in rw, with multiple services with crossings from two directions, just how the ai solves the traffic situations. As i see, the ai is working intelligently, but sometimes it fails, and the trains got stucked, so this ai is in a good direction, just need more developme...

for me, nothing changed in draw distance, maybe because i set the detail level to 10

did anyone tested the KS signals with scenario with ai trains, with crossings in their paths, and following trains? Because i did, and as i see the KS signals still have bugs (stuck on red), while if i replace the KS signals with HL with exactly the same links and placing, those signals work perfect...

RSderek wrote:• When passing a red signal, the scenario will end.

WHYY???? this is so unrealistic. RW is capable to simulate crashes, so why this needed?

- again offset tool, possibility to rotate 180 degrees the offsetted object (to put down for example single sided platform with the correct side next to the track, even if the track laid in opposite direction). already possible, when you click the offset icon, the arrow appears on the selection, cl...

bigvern wrote:I would just like it to be able to "heal" the holes in existing SRTM data..!

holes? The holes are not exists since the version2, since several years

it would be good if rw support a more universal DEM format for terrain, not just SRTM hgt. for example: USGS DEM, or GeoTiff

Hi! How about to make a big feature request topic(this :D) for rsdl team instead of making new topic for each feature request? I have a recommendation for some features in world editor user interface, that are easy to develop (i think): - on linear object tool, it would be good if you can write in t...

For single crossovers, the solution is simple: You split the connecting track in the middle and weld it again. Be sure to split at a place where there are no check rails or they will look crippled. For double crossovers (diamonds, X), this is often not possible because the straights between diamond...

I've made some tests: standard parallel track lay, simple crossover http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/267/crossstandardsimple.th.jpg (bugged) standard parallel track lay, X crossover http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/179/crossstandardx.th.jpg (bugged) Offset set to 5, simple crossover http://img25...

Here is the video about blend http://img204.imageshack.us/i/blend.mp4/
it between some track types, but never if one of the tracks are Generic yard tracks.

Your's isn't a "default" crossover, it isn't parallel track, and the spacing between track is bigger too. Try to lay parallel tracks with track laying tool (set to 2 or more), than make a crossover (no matter you use the crossover tool or make manually), and you will see this: http://img132.imagesha...

About one month ago i've started to "play" with world editor in RW, and i noticed various huge bugs... The most prominent is the graphics bug on crossover rails (if you dont know what it is, just lay parallel tracks, and make crossovers between them, then look at the rails carefully), but the funnie...