Atomic Systems

The only problem, with the train as it is at the moment, is the driver's door is quite a considerable distance too far back.

No, forget it. Forget what I last said. it was foolish in me even suggesting the idea. No, I'll leave this to the experts, who have proper equipment. If anyone attempts this, it will sure be better than my pathetic attempt. And this is it. I warn you, this graphic is very disturbing. :( http://www.x...

I have begun work on a cab. I'm not sure how good it is going to be, but it is a hand drawn cab.

**cough** I do that **cough**

Apparently they have full size train simulators. Does anyone have a bit more info on them?

As for the drivers view, it seems that it is a considerable distance behind, and without the cab, you get quite a long shadow in front of the train. The driver's access door really is too far behind, just does not look right. I have had other people confirm this. I'm not too bothered about a passeng...

#2 and #4 are my main concerns.

Chris Longhurst.

I have noticed a few flaws with this latest release. I will list them below. 1: The sounds are not right, from the outside, it sounds like a reasonable approximation of a 166, on the inside, sounds nothing like one. 2: The wipers don't function, and the black bar below does not wrap around far enoug...

That's what I just heard.

What airports were going to be expanded? I know Stansted was one of them.

I am going to attempt to start work on a cab. I've never done this before, and I don't have any good programs to do it with. Hopefully it will be better than my F/A-18A panel I made almost 4 years ago.

6 737-300s
1 737-200
1 757-200

I like it. I'll have to consider getting it.

I am still waiting for the cab and sounds too.

I also have an obsession with the real train too.