Search found 5718 matches
- Wed Jan 20, 2021 11:50 am
- Forum: [MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion
- Topic: Potteries Route Patch #3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 146
Re: Potteries Route Patch #3
There is a new version of the patch. If you have already installed Patch3, download this new version and install it over the original version. If you have not downloaded the older version, just download this new version and install it. It includes some minor revisions and two new activities. The dow...
- Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:03 am
- Forum: [MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion
- Topic: Potteries Route Patch #3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 146
Potteries Route Patch #3
Patch #3 of the Potteries Route is now available.
[uktsfile 40191]
[uktsfile 40191]
- Thu Jan 07, 2021 1:07 pm
- Forum: [MSTS1] Route Building
- Topic: Chiltern Line Continued
- Replies: 0
- Views: 99
- Mon Dec 28, 2020 3:17 pm
- Forum: [OR] General OpenRails Discussion
- Topic: Chiltern Line Continued
- Replies: 110
- Views: 7439
Re: Chiltern Line Continued
Patch #3 for the route has been complete.
This is at [uktsfile 40167]
The route is now only recommended for use in Open Rails.
This is at [uktsfile 40167]
The route is now only recommended for use in Open Rails.
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 12:04 pm
- Forum: [OR] General OpenRails Discussion
- Topic: 3D Cabview steam engine
- Replies: 46
- Views: 1325
Re: 3D Cabview steam engine
Very good Geoff. Could you make a version with a different front view to use with a tender engine?
- Sun Nov 15, 2020 9:24 pm
- Forum: [OR] General OpenRails Discussion
- Topic: 3D Cabview steam engine
- Replies: 46
- Views: 1325
Re: 3D Cabview steam engine
I have it working with an Ivatt 4MT.
- Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:50 am
- Forum: [OR] General OpenRails Discussion
- Topic: 3D Cabview steam engine
- Replies: 46
- Views: 1325
Re: 3D Cabview steam engine
As things are to add the fireman and the fire - we would need to change these to use relative texture addresses - a modification to the shape file - you can do with a text editor - but I think it is better to get Geoff to make common cab versions to include these perhaps. Thanks Darwin. I agree!!!!...
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 8:03 pm
- Forum: [OR] General OpenRails Discussion
- Topic: 3D Cabview steam engine
- Replies: 46
- Views: 1325
Re: 3D Cabview steam engine
Thanks Darwin. I am still confused as to how this would relate to the files in the download.
___________________
David
___________________
David
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:44 pm
- Forum: [OR] General OpenRails Discussion
- Topic: 3D Cabview steam engine
- Replies: 46
- Views: 1325
Re: 3D Cabview steam engine
I am totally confused! I assume we are discussing this download:
[uktsfile 40006]
Am I correct? If so what do I need to install and where to use the 3D cab on other locos?
[uktsfile 40006]
Am I correct? If so what do I need to install and where to use the 3D cab on other locos?
- Thu Nov 12, 2020 3:28 pm
- Forum: [MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion
- Topic: Route Riter Dynatrax Errors
- Replies: 32
- Views: 637
Re: Route Riter Dynatrax Errors
Ged, the big difference with the Dorset rout us that the DynaTrax files are in the route's SHAPES folder and do not need a path to be included.
David
David
- Thu Nov 12, 2020 12:56 pm
- Forum: [MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion
- Topic: Route Riter Dynatrax Errors
- Replies: 32
- Views: 637
Re: Route Riter Dynatrax Errors
There is no way we can now change the action of MSTS and Route Riter in this respect. However, as there is no problem running with or without the quotes in MSTS and RR, I think we should recommend to the author that TRSE, that it be modified to take the same action as MSTS and not the opposite as it...
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 6:29 pm
- Forum: [MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion
- Topic: Route Riter Dynatrax Errors
- Replies: 32
- Views: 637
Re: Route Riter Dynatrax Errors
Thanks for the insight Ged. What confuses me is that MSTS RE and TSRE make the exact opposite changes to theses entries with and without quotes.
MSTS and OR do not appear to have a problem with either format but are we sure that it is not effecting something?
___________________
David
MSTS and OR do not appear to have a problem with either format but are we sure that it is not effecting something?
___________________
David
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:42 am
- Forum: [MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion
- Topic: Route Riter Dynatrax Errors
- Replies: 32
- Views: 637
Re: Route Riter Dynatrax Errors
Anyone!?
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 1:21 am
- Forum: [OR] General OpenRails Discussion
- Topic: 3D Cabview steam engine
- Replies: 46
- Views: 1325
Re: 3D Cabview steam engine
Geoff, what classes would you say it is suitable for use with?
__________________
David
__________________
David
- Thu Nov 05, 2020 12:13 pm
- Forum: [OR] General OpenRails Discussion
- Topic: Chiltern Line Continued
- Replies: 110
- Views: 7439
Re: Chiltern Line Continued
The activities for the route were basically written for MSTS and then fine-tuned to work in Open Rails. They all work with the latest "Unstable" (terrible name!) version of Open Rails.